| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1962 SLG = 1962 SLD 2537 = 1962 PLD 6 |
West Pakistan
Revision Side No. 314 of 1960-61, decided on 31st August 1961, District Montgomery.
Presented By: A. M. K. Leghari, Member Bard of Revenue
Ghulam Ali Alvi for Petitioner.
Revision Side No. 314 of 1960-61, decided on 31st August 1961, District Montgomery.
Presented By: A. M. K. Leghari, Member Bard of Revenue
Ghulam Ali Alvi for Petitioner.
FARID-Petitioner
VERSUS
THE STATE AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Law: Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912
Section: Ss. 17 & 24
Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912), Ss. 17 & 24-Collector canceling A's temporary -Lambardar's grant-Collector allowing B, holding Horse Breeding Grant to exchange his land with land previously held by A-Commissioner allowing appeal of A and restoring land to A-A held entitled to take possession from B-B not competent to raise objection that no notice was served on him under S. 24. ORDER This is a revision petition against the order of the Additional Commissioner, Multan, dated 26-4-61, whereby he confirmed the Collector, Montgomery's order dated 28-2-61, restoring the Lambardari 1/2 square grant to the respondent. The facts briefly are that Rehmat Ullah respondent's temporary Lambardar's grant of half Lambardari square was cancelled under Collector's order dated 5-8-57. The present petitioner who held a Horse Breeding Grant in the same state, was allowed to exchanged some of his scattered poor quality bits of land equal in area with this half square, on the recommendation of the District Remount Officer on 17-8-59. Rehmat Ullah respondent, went up in appeal to the Additional Commissioner, Multan, who accepted it on 18-7-60 and restored the resumed Lambardari grant to Rehmat Ullah, as he had proved himself to be a temporary Lambardar grantee in possession from before 15-3-48. Thereupon the Col lector restored the grant back to Rehmat Ullah respondent, Farid's appeal against this restoration was rejected by the Additional Commissioner on 26-4-61. The petitioner's counsel contend that the restoration of the original Lambardari 1/2 square in the respondent's favour was against the rules as his client had not been served with…