Case Details

Citation(s)
1993 SLD 755 = 1993 CLC 489
Sindh High Court
Summary Suit No. 359 of 1985, decided on 10th December, 1992.
Before Wajihuddin Ahmed, J
Sajid Zahid for. Plaintiff. Mansoorul Arfin for Defendants Nos.l, 5, 7 to 12, 14 and 15. I.A. Hashmi for Defendants Nos.2 and 4. Raja H. Nawaz for Defendants Nos3 and 6. Khalid Anwar for Defendant No.13. Muhammad Ali Saeed for the alleged Contemnors. A.I. Chundrigar for the N.B.P.

EMIRATES BANK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, KARACHI---Plaintiff

VERSUS

ADAMJEE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, KARACHI and 14 others-- Defendants

Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Section: 94 , 151 , 2(3)

                                                                                                                                 Contempt of Court--- ---- Accidental/intentional disregard of Court's order---In contempt proceedings for an order of Court to take effect and bind those concerned, formal service thereof would not be necessary to prove; due knowledge of order would suffice---As to accidental disregard of order, claimed to be wanting in intention; once knowledge was shown, the very fact that contravening act of commission or omission, was undertaken intentionally and with volition, would render the act intentional. A.N.M. Mahmood v. M.O. Ghani PLD 1967 Dacca 67; M.O. Ghani v. A.N.M. Mahmood PLD 1966 SC 802 and Ahmad Shah v. State PLD 1967 SC 42 rel. Hayat Ahmed Khan v. Bashir Sadiq PLD 1952 Lah. 48 ref. Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----OXXXIX, R.2(3), Ss.94 & 151---Disobedience/breach of Court's order-- Object, scope and import of provisions of OXXXIX, Rr.l & 2, Ss.94 & 151 in respect of disobedience/breach of Court's order---Provisions of Obi, Rr.l & 2 are extension of S.94, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, under which they have been prescribed---Section 94, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, subject to Rules and Orders postulates that in order to prevent justice from being defeated, Court could grant temporary injunction and in case of disobedience, commit person guilty thereof, to civil prison and order that his property be attached and sold---Provisions of S.151, having envisaged exercise of inherent powers if necessary for the ends of justice, implication was that powers under the section could ipso facto be invoked in cases of disobedience or breach of an interim injunction or its terms, and the rule extends also to non-parties-- Court can adopt any procedure while dealing with a case of…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register