Law:

Section:

  Summary The constitutional petition arose from a landlord-tenant dispute in which the respondents claimed bona fide personal need for eviction. During the proceedings, the parties reached an amicable settlement. The High Court disposed of the petition by consent, directing the petitioner to vacate the premises within four months while continuing to pay rent during that period. The Court further clarified that the issue of fair rent would be decided separately in another pending petition, and all proceedings in the eviction case would conclude upon compliance with the settlement. Sections Used No specific statutory sections were mentioned. 2-Word Description Tenant Eviction Amicable Settlement   O R D E R The Petitioner, aggrieved by the judgments dated 10-03-2025 and 24-05-2025 in Rent Case No. 603 of 2023 and F.R.A. No. 87 of 2025 submitted that both courts committed illegality and misread evidence. It was submitted that the ejectment application was filed with malafide intent to pressure the Petitioner for higher rent. It is also urged that the personal need was unsubstantiated, several nearby shops were vacant, and the Special Power of Attorney relied upon was defective and used in multiple cases. It is added that cross-examination denied its validity, and the prior conduct of the Respondents indicated ulterior motives. At the initial stage, the Respondents' counsel opposed the petition, asserting bona fide personal…