| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLD 3134 |
Islamabad High Court
Criminal Misc. No. 794-B of 2022
Presented By: ARBAB MUHAMMAD TAHIR
04.08.2022 Raja Shaukat Mehmood Satti, Advocate for petitioner. Ch. Muhammad Jahangir & Mohsin Khan Abbasi, Advocates for respondent. Mian Zain Qureshi, state Counsel with Matloob, ASI.
Criminal Misc. No. 794-B of 2022
Presented By: ARBAB MUHAMMAD TAHIR
04.08.2022 Raja Shaukat Mehmood Satti, Advocate for petitioner. Ch. Muhammad Jahangir & Mohsin Khan Abbasi, Advocates for respondent. Mian Zain Qureshi, state Counsel with Matloob, ASI.
Raja Ghulam Murtaza
VERSUS
The State, etc.
Law: Pakistan Penal Code (PPC),1860
Section: 379, 506(ii), 442, 511, 148
ORDER-SHEET Through the instant Criminal Misc., petitioner (Raja Ghulam Murtaza) prays for pre-arrest bail in FIR No. 91, dated 22.04.2022, Under Section 379, 506(ii), 442, 511, 148 & 149 PPC, registered at Police Station Nilore, Islamabad. The subject FIR stood registered on the application of respondent No. 2 namely Raja Mehboob Hussain (complainant) who alleged therein that he purchased land measuring 55-Kanal, bearing Khasra No. 353 situated in Mouza Jandala, Dhoke Kahli from Syed Israr Hussain Shah and in this respect an agreement was also executed; that out of the said land, the complainant got transferred 40-Kanal in his name whereas possession of the entire land was handed over to him which is in his possession for the last 12-13 years and it was also earmarked as a separate piece of land by erecting wire-pickets and in this respect a survey report was also annexed which indicates separate status of the land at the spot; that one Kamran Riaz was also deputed as a security guard on the subject land; that today (16.03.2022) in the morning when Ghulam Yasin driver had been doing work with a machine and security guard was also present over there, at about 10:00 am few armed persons that includes Naseer S/o Ali Asghar along with his sons emerged and stopped the machine; that Masood s/o Sultan Muhammad along with his two sons and about 10 armed persons besides Manazir S/o Murtaza and Murtaza S/o Sher Muhammad (petitioner) emerged took away all articles, 10 sacks of cement, and wire pickets forcibly; that the assailants also hurled abuses and extended life threats, shutdown the machine and directed them (complainant and others) to leave; that the security guard went away due to fear while the assailants had been making ariel firing with their weapons and extended threats of dire consequences; that the security guard called the police through 15 due to which the assailants fled away and while leaving took along various articles. Learned counsel contends that the story narrated in the FIR is concocted; that the petitioner has falsely been implicated with malafide intention and ulterior motive; that there is…