Case Details

Citation(s)
1991 SLD 1799 = 1991 CLC 1663
Lahore High Court
Transfer Application No.158-C of 1991, decided on 19th May, 1991.
Presented By: Before Abdul Waheed J
Ch. Muhammad Sadiq for Applicants. Ch. Shahbaz Khurshid for
Respondents.

FARIDA KHANUM and another---Applicants

VERSUS

Mian MUHAMMAD WOMAN and others---Respondents

Law: Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)

Section: 12 , 24

Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----S. 12---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.24---Transfer of suit---Numerous adjournments to respondents for their evidence was made main ground for transfer of suit---Trial Court, although allowed many adjournments for production of respondents' evidence, nevertheless such fact did not at all, reflect any favouritism for respondents, for, Trial Court had also extended same indulgence to petitioners also by adjourning case not less than six times for their evidence---Trial Court's comment was that every adjournment which was granted either to respondents or to petitioners was for sufficient reasons which were duly recorded---Fact that Trial Court's acceptance of respondents' application for comparison of specimen signatures of a defendants' witness with those of admitted ones had been set aside by High Court in revision, such un-sustainability of judicial order would not per se justify transfer of case---Parties having already concluded their evidence and case being ripe for arguments and judicial decision, transfer of same at present stage would not be conducive to its expeditious disposal---Application for transfer of suit was dismissed in circumstances. Ch. Muhammad Sadiq for Applicants. Ch. Shahbaz Khurshid for Respondents. ORDER The petitioners have filed this petition under section 24, C.P.C. for the transfer of a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell instituted against them by the respondents from the Court of Mr.' Altaf Hussain Mahar, Civil Judge, Chunian. The transfer is sought on the grounds that the trial Court granted numerous adjournments to the respondents for their evidence and at the fag-end of the trial accepted an application moved by the respondents for obtaining specimen signatures of one Muhammad Ikram…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register