Case Details

Citation(s)
1972 SLD 3060 = 1972 SCMR 165
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Review Petition No. 13 of 1971, decided on 6th March 1972. (On review from the judgment and order of the Supreme Court, dated the 10th November 1971, in P. S. L. A. No. 197 of 1971).
Presented By: Sajjad Ahmad, Waheeduddin Ahmad and Salahuddin Ahmed, JJ
Manzur Qadir, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Muhammad Nazar Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for the State.

ABDUL HAMID-Petitioner

VERSUS

THE STATE-Respondent

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302-Person convicted for murder and sentenced to death-Petition for Special Leave to Appeal dismissed by Supreme Court but a review petition filed before the Court pending-General amnesty granted by Government commuting capital sentences of all condemned prisoners-Held, petitioner could avail of general amnesty even after disposal of review petition. Date of hearing : 6th March 1972.                                                                                                                          JUDGMENT SAJJAD AHMAD, J.-The main points urged in this review petition are that the impugned judgment has disregarded the effect of the circumstance that wares in the petitioner's shop were lying scattered, and some blood was found in front of the petitioner's shop on both sides of the metalled road, as stated by the investigating officer, which indicate that the complainant party was at least guilty of an offensive intrusion in the petitioner's shop, thereby furnishing a cause for grave and sudden provocation to the petitioner, reducing his offence to man-slaughter, and that, in any case, the sentence of death awarded to the petitioner was disproportionate to the nature of his crime. The presence of the blood in front of the petitioner's shop does not advance the defence plea. All these arguments were made at the hearing of the leave petition to support the plea of self-defence as well as to show the sudden and unpremeditated nature of the crime, but they were not accepted. If the circum stances now urged were doubted in support…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register