| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1972 SLD 3034 = 1972 SCMR 102 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K-134 of 1971, decided on 8th February 1972. (On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Sind & Baluchistan, Karachi, dated the 27th August 1971, in Letters Patent Appeal No. 126 of 1971).
Presented By: Sajjad Ahmad, Waheeduddin Ahmad and Salahuddin Ahmed, JJ
Ali Ahmed Fazeel, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Vakil Ahmed Kidwai, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for
Respondents.
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K-134 of 1971, decided on 8th February 1972. (On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Sind & Baluchistan, Karachi, dated the 27th August 1971, in Letters Patent Appeal No. 126 of 1971).
Presented By: Sajjad Ahmad, Waheeduddin Ahmad and Salahuddin Ahmed, JJ
Ali Ahmed Fazeel, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Vakil Ahmed Kidwai, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for
Respondents.
BEGUM MEHRUNNISA-Petitioner
VERSUS
NATIONAL BUILDING INDUSTRIES LID. KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS-Respondents
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: O. I, r. 10
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. I, r. 10-Parties to suit-Impleading nr refusing to implead party to a suit-Court exercises its discretion in matter-Suit for specific performance of contract between A and B compromised-Person not party to suit thereafter applying for being impleaded as part v-Court, held, justified in refusing to implead such person at that stage. Date of hearing : 8th February 1972. JUDGMENT SALAHUDDIN AHMED, J.-This petition for special leave is from an order of the High "Court of Sind & Baluchistan, refusing the petitioner's application under Order 1, rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It appears that the petitioner and respondent No. 3 entered into partnership on 27-2-1952 for the purpose of purchasing lands and selling them and sharing the benefits arising out of such transactions. In the year 1968 respondent No. 3, by two contracts agreed to sell to respondents Nos. 1 and 2 28 acres of land out of 68 acres of land purchased by the said partnership firm. Disputes, however, arose between the two partners, and a suit for rendition of accounts was filed by the petitioner on 10-8-1970. A preliminary decree was passed and a Commissioner was appointed to take accounts. During the pendency of this suit respondents Nos. 1 and 2 filed a suit against…