| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1972 SLD 3005 = 1972 SCMR 31 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal- No. 257 of 1971, decided on 16th November 1971. (On appeal from judgment and order of the High Court, Lahore, dated the 11th October 1971, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2530/B of 1971):
Presented By: Muhammad Yaqub Ali and Waheeduddin Ahmad, JJ
C. M. Latif Rawn, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Abdul Karim Sheikh, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners. Nemo for the State.
Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal- No. 257 of 1971, decided on 16th November 1971. (On appeal from judgment and order of the High Court, Lahore, dated the 11th October 1971, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2530/B of 1971):
Presented By: Muhammad Yaqub Ali and Waheeduddin Ahmad, JJ
C. M. Latif Rawn, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Abdul Karim Sheikh, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners. Nemo for the State.
NABAHOO AND 3 OTHERS-Petitioners
VERSUS
THE STATE-Respondent
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 497
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 302, 497
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 497 and Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302-Murder-Bail-Accused committed to stand trial for murder-Ordinarily commitment satisfies conditions laid down in S. 497, Cr. F. C. for disallowing bail. Date of hearing : 16th November 1971. ORDER MUHAMMAD YAQUB AEI, J.-The petitioners who are charged under section 302 read with section 34, P. P. C. applied to the High Court for bail during the pendency of the inquiry under Chapter 18 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The prayer was refused as one of the petitioners was alleged to have caused grievous injuries to the deceased and it could not be said at that stage that they were not vicariously liable under section 34, P. P. C. It was urged before the learned Single Judge that the two eye-witnesses were closely related ; that one of the recovery witness had not supported the prosecution case ; that the medical evidence has contradicted the prosecution version that Ramzan, petitioner, had caused an injury on the shoulder of the deceased ; and that there was no motive for the petitioners to kill the deceased. In the opinion of the learned Judge it was premature at that stage of…