Law:

Section:

  Tender-- ---- Highest bid---Highest bidder had got a right that his bid be properly considered by the public functionaries---Petitioner being the highest bidder although had got no vested right that his highest bid be accepted yet arbitrary rejection of his bid without properly considering his documents would give him a cause of action---Where a method was prescribed to do a thing it must be done in that way and not otherwise---Authority itself having chalked out a method of doing a thing in a particular way, any deviation from that would give cause of grievance to affected person---Letters of specified dates rejecting petitioner's highest bid were declared to have been passed without lawful authority and of no legal effect---Case was remitted to Authority for disposal in accordance with law---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199. Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. The International Air Port Authority of India and others AIR 1979 SC 1628; Rashid E1. Khan v. West Pakistan Railway Board etc. PLD 1973 Lah. 733; Wali Muhammad v. Karachi Metropolitan Corporation and 2 others 1981 CLC 730; Amanullah Khan and others v. The Federal Government of Pakistan etc. PLD 1990 SC 1092; Chairman, Regional Transporg Authority, Rawalpindi v. Pakistan Mutual Insurance Company Ltd., Rawalpindi PLD 1991 SC 14; Province of West Pakistan through Secretary, Public Works Department, Lahore v. Gammon's Pakistan Ltd., Karachi PLD 1976 Kar. 458; Anjuman-e-Ahmadiya, Sargodha v. The Deputy Commissioner, Sargodha and others PLD 1966 'SC 639; Mst. Tilawatunnisa and others v. Settlement Commissioner and others 1978 SCMR 225; Mustafa Khan and another v. Hakim Abdul Mughani and 3 others 1978 SCMR 154; Wilayat All v. Mst. Iqbal Sarwar and 3 others 1973 SCMR 458; Munshi Muhammad and others v. Faizanul Haq and another 1971 SCMR 533; Syed Muhammad v. The Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner and others 1976 SCMR 61; The Principal, Cadet College, Kohat and another v. Muhammad Shoaib Qureshi PLD 1984, SC 170 and M/s. Pacific Multinational (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Inspector General of Police and others PLD 1992 Kar. 283 ref. Practice and procedure --   ---- Where a method was prescribed to…