Case Details

Citation(s)
2026 SLG 2472 2026 SLD 2472
Islamabad High Court
  Crl. Appeal No.187 of 2016
Presented By: MIANGUL HASSAN AURANGZEB,ARBAB MUHAMMAD TAHIR
                                                              Date of Hearing        :             07.03.2022. Appellant by      :           Muhammad Ilyas Khan, Advocate   State by                    :           Shahbaz Shah, State Counsel.  _________________________________________________________________

Tehsin Anjum 

VERSUS

The State and another 

Law: Pakistan Penal Code (PPC),1860

Section: 394, 411, 324, 353, 186, 75, 177

JUDGMENT SHEET ARBAB MUHAMMAD TAHIR, J. The appellant, namely, Tehsin Anjum, through the preset appeal, has challenged the judgment dated 08.11.2016 passed by the learned Judge, Anti-Terrorism Court-II, Islamabad (“hereinafter referred to as “the ATC Court”) in case FIR No.654/14 dated 05.11.2014 registered in respect of offences under Sections 394, 411, 324, 353, 186, 75, 177, and 419 of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (“hereinafter referred to as “PPC”) and Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as “the 1997 Act”) [Sections 177 PPC and 7 of the 1997 Act were inserted in the FIR in question on 14.11.2014 and 19.01.2015] read with Sections 13, 20 and 65 of the Arms Ordinance, 1965 (herein after referred to as “the 1965 Ordinance”), at Police Station Sabzi Mandi, Islamabad, whereby he was convicted and sentenced as under:-   He is convicted and sentenced U/s 7 Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, to life imprisonment and his moveable and immoveable properties is hereby confiscated in favour of the state. He is also convicted u/s 324 PPC and sentenced to 07 years RI and fine of Rs.50,000/- in default, thereof, further undergo 06 months SI. He is also convicted u/s 353 PPC and sentenced to One year RI and fine of Rs.50,000/- in default, thereof, further undergo three months SI. He is also convicted u/s 186 PPC for two months RI and Rs.1000/- fine and in default, thereof, further undergo 15 days months SI. He also convicted u/s 337-A (i) PPC and sentenced two years RI and he is also directed to pay Rs.30,000/- Daman to the complainant who is also injured.    All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Benefit of Section 382-B, Cr.P.C. was also extended in favour of the appellant.   FACTUAL BACKGROUND:-   Specifically, resume of prosecution case as structured in the FIR (Exh.PR) lodged on the basis of the complaint (Exh.PH) of Ijaz Ahmed (PW6) is that on 05.11.2014, the complainant was proceeding to IMCG School situated in Sector I-10/4, Islamabad in order to pick his younger sister on motorcycle bearing registration No.FDR-5639 (Exh.P/2). When he reached the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register