| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 2436 2026 SLD 2436 = 2026 YLR 816 |
Sindh High Court, Larkana Bench
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. S-132 of 2025, decided on 6th October, 2025.
Presented By: Muhammad Saleem Jessar, J
Mst. Sughran Bibi v. The State PLD 2018 SC 595 rel. Muhammad Ali Memon and Raham Ali Abro for Applicant. Shahbaz Ali M. Brohi for
Respondent No. 3. Ali Anwar Kandhro, Addl. P.G for the State.
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. S-132 of 2025, decided on 6th October, 2025.
Presented By: Muhammad Saleem Jessar, J
Mst. Sughran Bibi v. The State PLD 2018 SC 595 rel. Muhammad Ali Memon and Raham Ali Abro for Applicant. Shahbaz Ali M. Brohi for
Respondent No. 3. Ali Anwar Kandhro, Addl. P.G for the State.
GHULAM MURTAZA MIRANI---Applicant
VERSUS
SSP SHIKARPUR and 3 others---Respondents
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 22-A, 161, 200
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) Ss. 22-A, 161 & 200---Powers of Justice of Peace under S.22-A, Cr.P.C. ---Scope---Petition filed under S.22-A, Cr.P.C.,by the respondent against the applicant for the registration of criminal case was allowed by the Ex-Officio Justice of Peace---Validity---Admittedly, the son of complainant had been shown as killed in an encounter with police on 24.08.2024 and to that effect FIR under Ss. 324, 353, 393 & 410, P.P.C., was registered---It was alleged by complainant that her son was taken away by the applicant/proposed accused, which was yet to be established by her through evidence---However, under the scheme of law no provision for second FIR had been provided---Complainant, however, was at liberty to file a complaint in terms of S.200, Cr.P.C or might approach the Investigating Officer of FIR already registered for recording her statement under S.161, Cr.P.C---Impugned order was not tenable---Application was allowed by setting aside impugned order. Date of hearing: 6th October, 2025. Order Muhammad Saleem Jessar, J.---Through this application, applicant Ghulam Murtaza Mirani has assailed the order dated 18.04.2025 penned down by 1st Additional Sessions Judge/Ex-Officio Justice of Peace, Shikarpur, wherby he has allowed the application under section 22-A(6)(i), Cr.P.C filed by respondent No. 3 against the applicant and directions were issued to SHO concerned to record the statement of respondent No. 3 in terms of section 154, Cr.P.C. 2. Learned Counsel for the applicant has argued that a police encounter occurred within the jurisdiction of PS Dour, District Shaheed Benazirabad on 24.08.2024, in which the son of respondent No. 3, namely, Aijaz Ahmed…