Case Details

Citation(s)
2026 SLG 2367 2026 SLD 2367 = 2026 MLD 713
Sindh High Court, Larkana Bench
1st Criminal Bail Application No. S-293 of 2023, decided on 29th January, 2024.
Presented By: Muhammad Saleem Jessar, J
Zaigham Ashraf v. The State and others 2016 SCMR 18 ref.        Mohammad Ali Memon for Applicant.        Ali Anwar Kandhro, Addl. P.G. for the State.        Abdul Hameed Mangi and Atta Hussain Qadri for the Complainant.

AIJAZ alias Aijaz Ali Jafferi---Applicant

VERSUS

The STATE---Respondents

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 497(2)

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 324, 114, 337-H(2), 148, 149-

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) S.497(2)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 324, 114, 337-H(2), 148 & 149---Attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, unlawful assembly---Post-arrest bail, grant of---Inquiry on non-vital part of the body---Previous enmity---Admittedly, there has been long standing landed dispute between the parties and both the eye-witnesses of the occurrence happened to the real brother and uncle of the complainant, therefore, false implication of petitioner in the background of previous enmity cannot be ruled out---First Information Report was lodged with delay of one day for which no plausible explanation has been furnished by the prosecution---Role attributed to the petitioner/accused is that he allegedly fired from his gun upon injured/prosecution witness which hit him on his thigh, which is a non-vital part of the body---The injured being empty handed was consequently at the mercy of the petitioner/accused, even then he did not repeat fire upon him which showed that the petitioner/accused had no intention to commit his qatl-i-amd, therefore, application of S.324, P.P.C could only be established after recording evidence at the trial---The injury attributed to the petitioner/accused falls under S.337-H(2), P.P.C, which does not fall within prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr.P.C---In such circumstances, the accusation against the petitioner/accused is yet to be determined by the Trial Court after recording pro and contra facts through evidence---Moreover, the petitioner/accused being Pesh Imam in the locality has good repute and respect in the eyes of public and there is no other criminal record against the petitioner/ accused---Every accused is presumed to be blue eyed boy of the law until and unless he may be found guilty of alleged charge---Law cannot be stretched upon in favour of the prosecution particularly at bail stage---Medico Legal Officer has declared the injury sustained by the injured to be punishable under S.337-H(1), P.P.C which carries maximum punishment up to seven years, hence does not exceed limits of prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr.P.C---Petitioner/accused has made out a good prima facie case for his release on bail within the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register