| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 2357 2026 SLD 2357 = 2026 MLD 649 |
Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, Bahalwalpur
Criminal Appeal No. 332 of 2019, decided on 21st November, 2025.
Presented By: Muhammad Amjad Rafiq, J
Ms.Khalida Rafique and Muhammad Sharif Bhatti with Abdul Rasheed, Appellant on bail. Shahid Farid, Assistant District Public Prosecutor for the State. Muhammad Imran Ashraf and Muhammad Sajjad Iqbal for the Complainant.
Criminal Appeal No. 332 of 2019, decided on 21st November, 2025.
Presented By: Muhammad Amjad Rafiq, J
Ms.Khalida Rafique and Muhammad Sharif Bhatti with Abdul Rasheed, Appellant on bail. Shahid Farid, Assistant District Public Prosecutor for the State. Muhammad Imran Ashraf and Muhammad Sajjad Iqbal for the Complainant.
ABDUL RASHEED and others---Appellants
VERSUS
The STATE and others---Respondents
Law:
Section: 302(b), 324, 337-F(iii), 337-L(2), 148, 149
2026 M L D 649 Lahore (Bahawalpur Bench) Before (a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Ss. 302(b), 324, 337-F(iii), 337-L(2), 148 & 149---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qal-i-amd, ghayr-jaifah-mutalahimah, causing hurt, rioting armed with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly---Appreciation of evidence---Ocular account proved---Accused were charged for assaulting complainant party, due to which one person died whereas three sustained firearm injuries---Record showed that contents of the FIR were duly corroborated by the complainant, who appeared before the Court and, with unwavering certainty, reaffirmed the nomination of the accused/appellants, attributing to each of them the specific roles described in the FIR---Testimony of complainant found further support in the statements of three eye-witnesses including two injured witnesses, all of whom fully endorsed the prosecution's version in every material particular---Said witnesses were subjected to extensive cross-examination by the defence, however, no material contradiction or inconsistency could be elicited to cast doubt on their credibility or weakened the prosecution's case---Testimonies of said witnesses remained consistent, coherent and mutually corroborative throughout---Appeal against conviction was dismissed, in circumstances. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Ss. 302(b), 324, 337-F(iii), 337-L(2), 148 & 149---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qal-i-amd, ghayr-jaifah-mutalahimah, causing hurt, rioting armed with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly---Appreciation of evidence---Lodging FIR with promptitude---Accused were charged for assaulting complainant party, due to which one person died whereas three sustained firearm injuries---Occurrence took place on 14.07.2015 at about 07:15 p.m. on the agricultural land of the complainant---Matter was reported to the police without delay at 08:45 p.m., resulting in the prompt registration of the FIR---Said immediacy in reporting lent strong assurance to the authenticity of the occurrence, indicating that it was neither obscure nor unobserved---Prompt lodging of the FIR constituted a strong corroborative circumstance in favour of the prosecution, wherein the complainant…