| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 2335 2026 SLD 2335 = 2026 LHC 3788 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1703-B of 2026
Presented By: (TANVEER AHMAD SHEIKH) JUDGE
17.06.2026. Ms. Nazia Bibi Abbassi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Muhammad Zaheer Arshad, Assistant Attorney General for Pakistan with Sadia Saba, Inspector FIA. Complainant in person.
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1703-B of 2026
Presented By: (TANVEER AHMAD SHEIKH) JUDGE
17.06.2026. Ms. Nazia Bibi Abbassi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Muhammad Zaheer Arshad, Assistant Attorney General for Pakistan with Sadia Saba, Inspector FIA. Complainant in person.
Muhammad Arshad.
VERSUS
The State.
Law: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898
Section: 497(1)
Law: Prevention of Smuggling of Migrants Act, 2018
Section: 3 & 6
Law: Emigration Ordinance, 1979
Section: 18 & 22
Tagline Statutory Delay vs. Gravity of Offence: Discretionary Denial of Post-Arrest Bail for "Hardened and Desperate" Criminals in Human Smuggling Cases. Summary The petitioner, Muhammad Arshad, sought post-arrest bail on the grounds of statutory delay under the 3rd proviso to Section 497(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.). Having been arrested on December 1, 2024, the petitioner remained in detention for over a year without the conclusion of his trial. The case against him involved serious allegations under the Emigration Ordinance, 1979, and the Prevention of Smuggling of Migrants Act (PSMA), 2018, specifically concerning a human smuggling operation that resulted in a boat capsizing near Libya, leading to the disappearance and presumed death of the complainant's son and numerous others. The Court acknowledged that the petitioner had been behind bars for a continuous period exceeding one year. However, it clarified that release under the 3rd proviso of Section 497(1) Cr.P.C. is not an automatic right. Under the 4th proviso, the court maintains the discretion to deny bail if the accused is deemed a "hardened, desperate, or dangerous criminal." In this instance, the Court categorized the petitioner as such due to the "dreadful" mode and manner of the offence—exploiting innocent citizens for significant sums of money under the guise of foreign employment, which ultimately led to a tragic loss of life. Consequently, the Court held that the gravity of the conduct and the severity of the incident outweighed the benefit of statutory delay, and the bail petition was dismissed. ORDER; The petitioner (Muhammad Arshad), being arrayed as an accused in case F.I.R. No. 74/2023, dated 06.07.2023, registered with Police Station FIA/AHTC, Rawalpindi, for offences under Sections 3 & 6 PSMA read with Section 18 & 22 of the Emigration Ordinance, 1979 , seeks his post arrest bail, after the same was refused to him by the court of learned Special Judge Central, Rawalpindi, vide order dated 25.03.2026. It was borne out of the record that petitioner was refused post arrest bail earlier on merits by the learned trial court…