| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1996 SLG 4090 1996 SLD 4090 , 1996 PLD 493 |
Sindh High Court
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.256 and Miscellaneous Application No. 1217 of 1996, decided on 23rd July, 1996.
Presented By: Before Wajihuddin Ahmed and Rasheed Ahmed Razvi, JJ
Mahmood A. Qureshi for Applicant.
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.256 and Miscellaneous Application No. 1217 of 1996, decided on 23rd July, 1996.
Presented By: Before Wajihuddin Ahmed and Rasheed Ahmed Razvi, JJ
Mahmood A. Qureshi for Applicant.
NAZIR AHMED --- Applicant
VERSUS
THE STATE --- Respondent
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 435 ,336 , 353 , 186 , 109 , 324 , 147 , 148 , 149
Penal Code (XLV of 1860) --- ---- S. 435/336/353/186/109/324/147/148/149 --- Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.561-A --- Quashing of proceedings --- Petition had claimed himself to be quite another person than the one indicted in the case and according to him an application filed by him in this regard was not entertained by the Trial Court-- No Court of law could refuse to entertain a case or an application at the level of its office and upon presentation the office was obliged to place the same for orders before the Court whose duty would be to pass lawful orders thereon -- Such plea of the petitioner, however, was not reflected in the impugned order -- Petitioner, in circumstances, was directed to file or repeat, as the case may be, such an application on which the Trial Court was directed to pass a speaking order after hearing him and the prosecution ---Petition was disposed of accordingly. Zahuruddin v. Haji Husain PLD 1991 Kar. 205 ref. Mahmood A. Qureshi for Applicant. ORDER Granted. The applicant claims himself to be quite another person than the one indicted. Since the plea is not reflected in the impugned order, we, at the outset, asked the learned counsel as to why the applicant did not seek appropriate orders regarding his identity and involvement in the proceedings from the learned…