| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 2330 2026 SLD 2330 |
C.P.L.A.143-Q/2025 [against the judgment dated 25.06.2025 passed by the High Court of Balochistan, Quetta in C.P. No.1263/2024]
Presented By: JUSTICE AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE ALI BAQAR NAJAFI
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naimatullah, ASC For
Respondent Nos1-9 : Mr. Muhammad Jameel, ASC For
Respondent No.10 : Nemo.
Respondent No.11 : Proforma
Respondent Research Assistance by : Dr. Muhammad Mumtaz Research Officer Date of Hearing : 04.06.2026
Mst. Bibi Amina and others …Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
Shamsullah and others …Respondent(s)
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: 12(2)
Law: Contract, Act, 1872
Section: 29
(Original/Appellate/Advisory Jurisdiction)
Concise summary;
The judgment sets aside the High Court’s decision and restores the suit, holding that the compromise decree was unsafe because it relied on vague, uncertain terms affecting unspecified inheritance properties and because the record showed serious doubts about informed consent and authenticity.
Core dispute
The case concerns daughters/heirs of deceased parents who challenged a compromise decree in an inheritance suit, claiming the settlement was procured through fraud, misrepresentation, and concealment, and that it unlawfully affected properties not actually part of the suit.