Law: Azad Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 324, 341, 337-D, 337-F(iii), 34

Law: Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979

Section: 17(2)

Law: Arms Act (XIII of 1965)

Section: 15

Law: Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974

Section: 42

(On Appeal from the judgment of the High Court dated 02.12.2024, passed in Revision Petition No. 414 of 2024). Azad Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Ss. 324, 341, 337-D, 337-F(iii) & 34---Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.17(2)---Arms Act (XX of 1965), S.15---Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Art. 42---Appeal---Attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, wrongful restraint, causing jaifah, ghayr-jaifah-mutalahimah, common intention, harabbah, possession of unlicensed weapon---Accused/respondent was arrested in the said offences---Accused/respondent submitted bail application before the Court, which was dismissed---Accused/respondent filed revision petition against the said order before the High Court, which was allowed and he was admitted to bail---Validity---In the present case, it appeared from the record that the accused-respondent was not nominated in the FIR, rather his arrest was solely based on the disclosure of the principal accused, who was alleged to have fired the shot---At this stage, there was no independent or corroborative material to prima facie establish his presence or active participation at the scene of occurrence---Allegation of association with principal accused remained unsubstantiated and fell within the realm of further inquiry---Appellant had not demonstrated any legal infirmity or perversity in the impugned bail granting order of the High Court to justify interference---Prosecution shall be at liberty to approach the competent forum for cancellation of bail, if any fresh material surfaced during the trial---Appeal was disposed of, accordingly.             Date of hearing: 30th April, 2025.                                                                                               Judgment         Raza Ali Khan, J.---This appeal has been preferred against the…