| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 2153 2026 SLD 2153 = 2026 PLD 222 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Petitions Nos. 532, 444-L and 445-L of 2018, decided on 22nd April, 2025.
Presented By: Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Athar Minallah and Salahuddin Panhwar, JJ
Ms. Bushra Qamar, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners (in Crl. P. No. 532 of 2018). Naveed Ahmad Khawaja, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners (in Crl. Ps. Nos. 444-L and 445-L of 2018). Irfan Zia, Addl. P.G., Punjab for the State. Assistance: Muhammad Subhan Malik (Judicial Law Clerk).
Criminal Petitions Nos. 532, 444-L and 445-L of 2018, decided on 22nd April, 2025.
Presented By: Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Athar Minallah and Salahuddin Panhwar, JJ
Ms. Bushra Qamar, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners (in Crl. P. No. 532 of 2018). Naveed Ahmad Khawaja, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners (in Crl. Ps. Nos. 444-L and 445-L of 2018). Irfan Zia, Addl. P.G., Punjab for the State. Assistance: Muhammad Subhan Malik (Judicial Law Clerk).
ZUNAIR YOUNAS and another---Petitioners
VERSUS
The STATE through P.G., Punjab and another---Respondents
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 161
Law: Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)
Section: 38, 39, 40
Law: Constitution of Pakistan Olympic Association
Section: 4, 9, 10-A, 14
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1962
Section: 302(b), 377
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section:
(On appeal against the judgments dated 09.04.2018 passed by the Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, Bahawalpur in Crl. As. Nos.304, 305, 313 and M.R.No.39 of 2014/BWP.). (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) S. 161---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 140---Statements under section 161, Cr.P.C. are not admissible except for limited purpose of contradiction under Article 140 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984. (b) Words and phrases Discovery' and 'recovery'---Distinction stated. Black's Law Dictionary rel. (c) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984) Arts. 38, 39 & 40---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 162---Disclosure of accused---Custodial discoveries---Admissibility and reliance---Principles---Evidentiary admissibility permitted under Article 40 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 must not be employed as a device to sidestep overarching protections enshrined in Articles 38 & 39 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 and section 162, Cr.P.C.---Where a discovery is made on the basis of such disclosure, resultant recovery must be independently evaluated on the touchstone of credibility, reliability, and corroboration through forensic or circumstantial material---Limited admissibility under Article 40 Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 does not, by itself, prove guilt but only allows a fact to be brought on record which might, when considered in conjunction with other evidence, contribute to the chain of circumstances---In order for provision of Article 40 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 to be validly invoked, following essential elements must be satisfied: (i) Accused must be in lawful police custody in that particular case at the time of making disclosure. A voluntary disclosure made outside custodial context does not attract operation of Article 40 of Qanun-e-Shahadat. (ii) Information must be specific and must distinctly relate to the fact discovered. Generalized or vague statements are not covered; discovery must be directly traceable to information furnished. (iii) There must be tangible discovery of a material fact, such as recovery of an object, article, weapon, or place, which was…