| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 1984 2026 SLD 1984 = 2026 CLC 252 |
Lahore High Court
R.F.A. No. 23970 of 2025, decided on 2nd July, 2025.
Presented By: Before Sultan Tanvir Ahmad and Hassan Nawaz Makhdoom, JJ
Ch. Umar Hayat Kamran Rajoka for Appellant. Naseer Ahmad Jaura for
Respondent.
R.F.A. No. 23970 of 2025, decided on 2nd July, 2025.
Presented By: Before Sultan Tanvir Ahmad and Hassan Nawaz Makhdoom, JJ
Ch. Umar Hayat Kamran Rajoka for Appellant. Naseer Ahmad Jaura for
Respondent.
TAHIR JAVED ---Appellant
VERSUS
MUHAMMAD SHARIF ---Respondent
Law: Contract Act, 1872
Section: IX,126
Law: Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section: XXVI,6,118
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: XXXVII,1,2
Contract Act (IX of 1872)--- ----S. 126---Negotiable Instruments Act (XXVI of 1881), Ss. 6 & 118---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XXXVII, Rr. 1 & 2---Suit for recovery of amount---Dishonored cheque---Terms contract of guarantee , surety , principal debtor and creditor ---Guarantee cheque---Proof---Suit filed by respondent / plaintiff was decreed against appellant / defendant as the cheque given by him was dishonored on presentation---Contention of appellant / defendant was that the cheque issued by him was of guarantee---Validity---There are three distinct parties in a contract of guarantee: the surety, the principal debtor, and the creditor ---Appellant/defendant did not qualify either as a surety or a third-party guarantor but he squarely fell within the definition of the principal debtor --Subject cheque, was a negotiable instrument under S. 6 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and was governed by the statutory presumptions enshrined in S. 118 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881---No material illegality, irregularity, misreading, or non-reading of evidence was pointed out by appellant/defendant---Trial Court rightly appreciated the evidence and correctly applied settled legal principles in decreeing the suit under O.XXXVII, C.P.C.--High Court declined to interfere in judgment and decreed passed against appellant / defendant---Appeal was dismissed, in circumstances. Muhammad Azizur Rehman v. Liaquat Ali 2007 SCMR 1820; Haji Karim and another v. Zikar Abdullah 1973 SCMR 100; Rab Nawaz Khan v. Javed Khan Swati 2021 SCMR 1890; Muhammad Arshad and another v. Citibank N.A. Lahore 2006 SCMR 1347; Col. (Retd.) Ashfaq Ahmed and others v. Sh. Muhammad Wasim 1999 SCMR 2832; Najaf Iqbal v. Shahzad Rafique 2020 SCMR 1621; Messrs State Engineering Corporation Ltd. v. National Development Finance Corporation and others 2006 SCMR 619; Khizar Hayat v. Malik Akhtar Mehmood 2024 SCMR 1208; Bazm-e-Salat and others v. Messrs United Bank Ltd PLD 1989 Kar. 150; ICDS Ltd. v. Beena Shabbeer and another (2002) 6 SC Cases 426; Muhammad Akhtar v. Zahar Khan 2006 CLD 737 and Muhammad Nawaz v. Qazi Muhammad Rashid 2018 CLD 104 ref. Date of hearing: 19th June, 2025. JUDGMENT…