| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1961 SLG 1966 1961 SLD 1966 = 1961 PLD 101 |
West Pakistan
Appellate Side No. 128 of 1959-60, decided on 9th February 1961, District Lahore
Presented By: Nasir Ahmad, Member Board of Revenue
Amanatullah for Appellant. Khawaja Abdur Rahim and Ghulam Dastagir for
Respondents. Sardar Shah Bukhari for
Respondent No. 1. Secretary R. T. A.
Appellate Side No. 128 of 1959-60, decided on 9th February 1961, District Lahore
Presented By: Nasir Ahmad, Member Board of Revenue
Amanatullah for Appellant. Khawaja Abdur Rahim and Ghulam Dastagir for
Respondents. Sardar Shah Bukhari for
Respondent No. 1. Secretary R. T. A.
THE NEW LYALLPUR-SAMUNDRI TRANSPORT Co. LTD. GROUP V, LYALLPUR -Appellant
VERSUS
MESSRS MUHAMMAD NAZIR-1NAYAT ULLAH & Co. LAHORE' AND ANTOHER-Respondents
Law:
Section:
Route permit-Appeal by one director of Company-Other directors raising objection to appeal-Appeal not competent. ORDER This appeal has been preferred by the New Lyallpur-Samundri Transport Company Ltd. through Mailk Sultan Muhammad one of the directors of the company against the grant of certain route permits to Messrs Muhammad Nazir Inayatullah & Co. by the R. T. A. Lahore, in their meetings held on 14-5-1950 A preliminary objection has been taken on behalf of the other two directors of the Comp any by Khawaja Abdul Rahim, Advocate. It is urged that the appellant Company has three directors and two of them, i.e., the majority are opposed to this appeal. I have been referred to an agreement between the three directors of the appellant Company which was made a rule of the Court by Mr. Justice Shabir Ahmad of the West Pakistan High Court requiring all the three directors to come to' a unanimous decision for performing any act and in case the decision was not unanimous the matter had to be dropped. The plea taken up by the appellant's counsel is that a single director of a company is competent under the law to perform any act on behalf of the Company. This is a matter, which as the appellate authority under the Motor Vehicles Act, I am not called upon to adjudi cate. The simple fact is that -two of the three directors object to the appeal and…