Law:

Section:

  Lambardar-Appointment-Candidate belonging to Lam bardar family-Not by itself-sufficient to appoint him Lambardar.   Lam5ardar-Appointment-Collector's decision cannot be upset if it is neither perverse nor foolish.   Lambardar-Appointment-Candidate must own sufficient property to cover land revenue demand.  ORDER   This is a second appeal against the order of the learned Additional Commissioner, Lahore, who upset the appointment of the appellant Ismail as Lambardar of Chak No. 5-G. B., District Sheikhupura, and appointed Abdul Hamid, the -respondent instead. The Additional Commissioner intervened on the ground that Abdul Hamid came of a Lambardar family and thus had a better claim to the appointment. I have already held in R. O. R. No. 110 of 1960/61 Abdullah Khan v. Ghulam Haider that this-fact by itself is not sufficient to warrant interference in the order…