| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1961 SLG 1945 1961 SLD 1945 = 1961 PLD 89 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 68 of 1959, decided on 20th December 1960.
Presented By: A. R. Cornelius, C. J., Amiruddin Ahmad and Fazle Akbar, JJ
Mahmud Ali Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Rafiq Ahmad Advocate Sunreme Court with him) instructed by Siddiq and company Attorneys for Appellant.
Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 : Ex parte. H. S. Suhrawardy Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Ahmud Saeed Kirmani Advocate Supreme Court, with him) instructed by Amjad Hussain, Attorney for
Respondent No. 3.
Civil Appeal No. 68 of 1959, decided on 20th December 1960.
Presented By: A. R. Cornelius, C. J., Amiruddin Ahmad and Fazle Akbar, JJ
Mahmud Ali Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Rafiq Ahmad Advocate Sunreme Court with him) instructed by Siddiq and company Attorneys for Appellant.
Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 : Ex parte. H. S. Suhrawardy Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Ahmud Saeed Kirmani Advocate Supreme Court, with him) instructed by Amjad Hussain, Attorney for
Respondent No. 3.
P. G. BHANDARI-Appellant
VERSUS
THE REHABILITATION AUTHORITY, LAHORE AND 2 OTHERSRespondents
Law:
Section:
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Custodian, Evacuee Property, West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 17th June 1958, in Miscellaneous Application No. 1 of 1958). Pakistan (Administration of Evacuee Property) Ordinance (XV of 1949), S. 36 (4) (5)-Revision-Review-New facts alleged since previous order-New facts may sustain fresh proceedings--Revision or Review of previous order not necessary. West Punjab Protection of Evacuee Property Act (VII of 1945), S. 17Restoration of ownership of property to evacuee. Custodian not empowered to resume property at discretion. Under the Constitution, rights in property cannot be sequestrated except by due process of law, and having once restored property to an evacuee, if by that act the property ceased to be evacuee property and appertained in full right of ownership to the owner, then the Custodian could not purport to exercise powers in respect of it, as if it were evacuee property unless the necessary conditions were satisfied, i.e., that the owner was shown to have been absenting himself or to be absenting himself from West Punjab, and then only by due process. To take back the property at discretion would be entirely outside the Custodian's power. West Punjab Protection of Evacuee Property Act (VII of 1948), S. 22 (d)"Evacuee"--Definition-"Has been or is absenting himself "-Meaning-Has no reference to absence being "temporary" or "permanent" or whether absence was "isolated" or matter of "repeated occurrence". Evacuee property-Evolution of legislation in regard to evacuee propertyCustodian's duty to "preserve" and "protect" evacuee property becoming later a duty of "assuming title" in abandoned properties "on principle of escheat", for purpose of distributing same among refugees. West Punjab Protection of Evacuee Property Act (VII of 1948), S. 17-Property restored to evacuee-Ceases to be evacuee--[Begum Muhammad Ismail v. Mst. Santosh Lata P L D 1957? Cust. (W. P.) 10 distinguished]. ?????????? West Punjab Protection of Evacuee Property Act (VII of 1948), S.…