| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1971 SLG 3046 1971 SLD 3046 = 1971 PCRLJ 309 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Appeal No. 145 of 1969, decided on 15th April 1970.
Presented By: Sajjad Ahmad and Wahiduddin Ahmad, JJ
Mian Hamiduddin, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Abdul Karim, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Sardar Muhammad Zafrullah, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by M. Siddiq, Advocate-on-Record on behalf of Ijaz Ali, Advocate-on-Record for the State.
Criminal Appeal No. 145 of 1969, decided on 15th April 1970.
Presented By: Sajjad Ahmad and Wahiduddin Ahmad, JJ
Mian Hamiduddin, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Abdul Karim, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Sardar Muhammad Zafrullah, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by M. Siddiq, Advocate-on-Record on behalf of Ijaz Ali, Advocate-on-Record for the State.
AHMAD NAWAZ-Appellant
VERSUS
THE STATE-Respondent
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 302, 100
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court. of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 3rd April 1967, in Criminal Appeal No. 529 of 1964). Penal Code (XLV of 1860) S. 302 read with S. 100-Murder trial-Self-defence, right of-Complainant-party in concerted action making deliberate attack on accused party and latter defending itself Shots fired by accused party in thick of assault in order to save themselves from surprised onslaught-No satisfactory circumstance to warrant conclusion that accused in situation was no) entitled to exercise complete right of self-defence-Accused given benefit of doubt and acquitted in circumstances. Date of hearing : 15th April 1970. JUDGMENT SAJJAD AHMAD, J.-Ahmad Nawaz appellant was tried jointly along with one, Bakhsha, who was stated to be his friend, for causing the murder of Nusrat son of Sanatta (section 302/34, P. P. C.) and also for attempting on the lives of P. W. Nusrat son of Sahib and P. W. Amir (section 307/34, P. P. C.-two counts). The trial Judge convicted Ahmad Nawaz alone for the murder of Nusrat and sentenced him to transportation for life. He was further held guilty on the charge of attempted murder of Nusrat P. W. and sentenced to life imprisonment on that count also. The sentences were made to run concurrently. Bakhsha was held responsible for the attempt on the life of Amir and sentenced to rigorous imprison ment for a period of ten years. Section 34 was not applied to their cases and each was held guilty of his own individual act, that is to say, Ahmad Nawaz for causing the murder, of deceased Nusrat son of Sanatta and for causing a, fire-arm injury to Nusrat son of Sahib in an attempt to kill him. Bakhsha 'was convicted for having ineffectively fired at P. W. Amir and was absolved of the responsibility of causing fatal injury to Nusrat on of Sanatta and of the murderous assault on Nusrat son of Sahib. Both of them filed an 'appeal to the High Court which resulted in the acquittal of Ahmad Nawaz of the charge under section 307, P. P. C. for attempting on the life of P. W. Nusrat son of Sahib and also in the, acquittal of Bakhsha of he charge of firing at P. W. Amir. The conviction and…