| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1961 SLG 1847 1961 SLD 1847 = 1961 PLD 71 |
West Pakistan
R. O. A. M. No. 22 of 1960-61, decided on 7th December 1960, District Lahore.
Presented By: M. W. Abbasi, Member Board of Revenue
Salamatullah for Appellant. Secretary R. T. A., Lahore.
R. O. A. M. No. 22 of 1960-61, decided on 7th December 1960, District Lahore.
Presented By: M. W. Abbasi, Member Board of Revenue
Salamatullah for Appellant. Secretary R. T. A., Lahore.
THE AHMED TRANSPORT COMPANY-Appellant
VERSUS
OTHER. T. A., LAHORE-Respondent
Law:
Section:
Route permit-Not necessary that B Part permit must always be carried and produced on demand. Route permit-Breach of R. 4.9 (iii), Motor Vehicles Rules-Offence ORDER This is an appeal against R. T. A., Lahore's order suspending the appellant's route permit on Lyallpur-Sialkot. route for a period of one month. The ground on which this action was taken was that the driver failed to produce either the route permit or registration certificate on demand. Actually the registration certificate had been submitted to the Registering- Authority in connection with the payment of token tax but it is admitted that the route permit (B part) was not produced by the driver on demand as required by rule 4.9 (iii). R. T. A's. order under section 60 has been challenged on the ground that the drivers failure-to produce the B Part permit did not involve the breach of any condition either specified in subsection (3) of section 59 or in the permit. On behalf of R. T. A. it is contended that the B Part permit contains a condition that the permit whenever demanded by an…