Law:

Section:

 Mutation-Sanctioned on basis of registered document Subsequently party alleging that agreement was obtained by misrepresentation-Order of mutation not to be upset-Aggrieved party may seek his remedy in Court.  ORDER   The petitioner entered into an agreement with the respondent by which he relinquished 16 kanals of land and was to become the full owner of the remaining 24 kanals. This agreement was registered on 21-3-1955. Mutations Nos. 3979 and 3980 were attested on 7-7-55. In August 1956, it was contended that the petitioner on the misrepresentation that he was an occupancy tenant, although he was a tenant-at-will, obtained the agreement. The Collector permitted the review of orders dated 7-7-55. On review the Assistant Collector cancelled the mutations by his orders dated 27-4-57. This order was confirmed by the Collector on appeal and by the Additional Commissioner in revision.   In Revenue Decisions Punjab 1950, page 1015, it was held that "no question of correction can arise in a case like this where one party objects strongly to the new entry. If there has, in…