| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 1633 2026 SLD 1633 = 2026 PLJ 49 |
Lahore High Court
Crl. A. No. 75442 of 2021, decided on 20.3.2025.
Presented By: Ali Baqar Najafi, J.
Mr. Mazhar Ali Haider, Mr. Muhammad Habib Chaudhary, Ch. Tariq Mehmood Ghumman and Ms. Salma Iqbal, Advocates for Appellant. Mr. Muhammad Atif Khan, Deputy District Public Prosecutor for State. Mr. Omais Nasir Bhatti, Advocate for Complainant. Date of hearing: 4.3.2025.
Crl. A. No. 75442 of 2021, decided on 20.3.2025.
Presented By: Ali Baqar Najafi, J.
Mr. Mazhar Ali Haider, Mr. Muhammad Habib Chaudhary, Ch. Tariq Mehmood Ghumman and Ms. Salma Iqbal, Advocates for Appellant. Mr. Muhammad Atif Khan, Deputy District Public Prosecutor for State. Mr. Omais Nasir Bhatti, Advocate for Complainant. Date of hearing: 4.3.2025.
KASHIF ALI--Appellant
VERSUS
STATE etc.--Respondents
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 302(b)
PLJ 2026 Cr.C. (Note) 49 [Lahore High Court, Lahore] Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860)-- ----S. 302(b)--Qatl-e-amd--Conviction and sentence--Challenge to--Ocular account--Medical evidence--Investigation--The occurrence was not only erupted at spot between close relatives but also shareholders of ancestral land--The cart was used by complainant to block thoroughfare used by appellant side--The deceased asked his uncle, to desist from interrupted way but they started demolishing on their own side as it had run on land of appellant--However, as per autopsy report as well as medical examination of deceased when in injured condition, use of blunt weapon was indicated--It was also admitted by doctor that head injury could have been caused due to appellant due to hitting of head of deceased to a blunt area--Two person were also injured and their medical examinations were conducted by same doctor and their injuries were suppressed in FIR--The FIR was itself lodged of occurrence which happened of course, without adequately explaining delay--They waited for death of deceased and then lodged FIR on 16.12.2016--In this like situation where there was no pre-planned and no weapon of offence was actually carried by appellant to commit offence, it can safely be concluded that occurrence took place at spur of moment--Importantly, said “Mohri” was recovered after one month--Appeal dismissed. [Para 13] A, B, C & D 2020 SCMR 281. Judgment Through this appeal filed under Section 410, Cr.P.C., the judgment dated 14.09.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Samundri in case FIR No. 270/2016, dated 16.12.2016, under Section 302, 34, PPC, registered at police station Mureedwala, District Faisalabad has…