Case Details

Citation(s)
2026 SLG 1528 2026 SLD 1528 = 2026 PLJ 27
Sindh High Court
Const. P. No. D-1640 of 2024, decided on 9.12.2025.
Presented By: Zulfiqar Ali Sangi and Abdul Hamid Bhurgri, JJ.
Mr. Ali Raza Baloch, Additional Advocate General Sindh for
Respondents. Dr. Ali Gul Shah present in person for
Respondent No. 3. Date of hearing: 25.11.2025.

Syed MUHAMMAD ALI SHAH--Petitioner

VERSUS

PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh, Karachi and others--Respondents

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 199

PLJ 2026 Karachi 27 (DB) Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- ----Art. 199--Writ of quo warranto--Floating posts BPS-19/20--Reclassification of post--Own pay scale--Validity of notification--Eligibility criteria--Policy decision of competent authority--Scope of quo warranto--usurpation of public office--Undisputed position is that, by virtue of Notification dated 11.04.2022, Government of Sindh had formally reclassified post of District Health Officer as a floating post capable of being held by officers of BPS-19 or BPS-20--Said notification continues to hold field--No challenge to its legality, competence, vires, or underlying rationale had been raised before us--Once post is reclassified in this manner, eligibility of an officer holding BPS-19 to be posted against same flows directly from policy decision of competent authority--Appointment of Respondent No. 3 is, therefore, traceable to a lawful source of authority--It is well-settled that a writ of quo warranto issues only where an appointment to a public office is shown to be patently illegal, void, or made in derogation of an express statutory mandate-- Jurisdiction is supervisory in nature and did not extend to examining suitability, seniority, comparative merit, or administrative preferences among eligible officers--Scope of quo warranto being limited, and appointment of Respondent No. 3 being supported by a validly notified policy and made by competent authority within its administrative domain, no case of usurpation of public office is made out--Petition dismissed.                                                                         [Pp. 29, 30] A, B, C & D PLD 2011 SC 516 ref. Petitioner in person. Order Abdul Hamid Bhurgri, J.--The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a writ of quo…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register