Case Details

Citation(s)
2026 SLG 1452 2026 SLD 1452 = 2026 PHC 611
Peshawar High Court
W.P. No.3170-P/2025
Presented By: WIQAR AHMAD, J.
Date of hearing                      27.11.2025 For Petitioner(s):                Mr.      Shumail      Ahmad      Butt Advocate. For
Respondent(s):    Mr.  Muhammad  Riaz  Khan Paindakhel AAG along with Mr. Waqar Khan Section Officer                                 (lit)               Health Department.

Dr. Ikram Ullah Khan

VS

. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 199,212

Law: Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Ordinance, (XXXII of 1962)

Section: 15

Law: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 2011

Section: 6

SUMMARY A writ petition is maintainable only against final orders passed by the departmental authority. Interim measures or order of such authority could not be treated ripe for invoking the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court, unless same suffers from jurisdictional defeats, are mala fide, coram non judice, or otherwise likely to perpetuate injustice.   The petitioner (a Medical Officer) challenged disciplinary proceedings initiated against him on the ground that PMDC registration was not required for his post and that the Chief Minister’s letter directed closure of inquiry. The Court held that the disciplinary proceedings were still pending and no final adverse order had been passed. Therefore, the writ petition under Article 199 was premature and not maintainable. The Court further observed that internal departmental inquiries cannot be stopped through constitutional jurisdiction unless there is final order, jurisdictional defect, or mala fide—none of which were established. The petition was accordingly dismissed. Sections / Articles / Rules Used Article 199 – Constitution of Pakistan (Writ jurisdiction) Article 212 – Constitutional bar regarding service matters (Service Tribunal jurisdiction) Section 15 – PMDC Ordinance, 1962 – Medical practitioner registration requirement Rule 6 – KP Efficiency & Disciplinary Rules, 2011 – Suspension/inquiry initiation Core Legal Principle Writ jurisdiction is not maintainable in premature disciplinary proceedings Departmental inquiry must reach final order before judicial review Administrative letters (like CM letter) are not binding appellate orders Two-word Case Descriptions (2 pairs) Premature Writ Disciplinary Valid JUDGMENT SHEET Instant writ petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, (Constitution) is filed by the petitioner with following prayers: “That, while accepting this Writ Petition, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to Hold, declare and Direct:-   That the inactions and omissions of the       …
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register