Case Details

Citation(s)
2026 SLG 1269 2026 SLD 1269 = 2026 PHC 1144
Peshawar High Court
W.P No. 8823-P/2025,W.P No. 8950-P/2025,W.P No. 9020-P/2025,W.P No. 8528-P/2025,W.P No. 8489-P/2025,W.P No. 8277-P/2025,W.P No. 5745-P/2025,
Presented By: Dr. Khurshid Iqbal, J
Date of hearing:                   09.12.2025. For petitioner(s):                  Mr. Shakeel Khan Kundi, Advocate. For respondent(s):               Mr. Azhar Rahim, AAG.

Munir Khan

VS

. The State through Secretary, Home Department, Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar & Others/Takasar Hussain vs. The Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Chief Secretary, Civil Secretariat & Others/Suhrab Ali vs. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Secretary Home & Tribal Affairs, Peshawar & Others/Habil Hassan vs. District Police Officer, Kohat & Others/Syed Shah Rukh vs The State through Advocate General, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar & Others/(Hamid Khan vs. District Police Officer, Kohat & Others)/(Muhammad Shafi vs. The State through Advocate General, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar & Others)

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10A

Law: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898

Section: ,243

Law: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Arms Act, (XXIII of 2013)

Section: 19,15

Law: Arms Ordinance, 1965

Section: 13,15

Law: Control of Narcotics Substances Act, 1997

Section: 9(c)

Law: West Pakistan Regulation and Control of Loudspeakers and Sound Amplifiers (Amendment) Act, 2011

Section: 3,4,13

summary Held: Constitution of Pakistan, Articles 4, 9, 10A, 14 & 18 — Police Clearance Certificate — Distinction between Internal Retention and Outward Disclosure — Minor Convictions & Dignity— The State cannot use a routine administrative document (Police Clearance Certificate) to impose a “civil death” or permanent disability on a citizen for a minor, concluded error. Article 14 (Dignity) is not merely about physical custody; it includes the right to reputation and social reintegration. When the State discloses a minor, spent conviction (e.g., a small fine for a regulatory offence) to an employer or foreign visa officer, it is effectively labeling the citizen as a criminal in perpetuity. This “labeling” is a disproportionate state action that violates Article 9 (Right to Life/Livelihood). While the police may keep records for internal surveillance, they cannot outwardly certify a citizen as having a “criminal record” for ordinary civil purposes (jobs, travel) if the offence was minor and the sentence has been served. Section 243 Cr.P.C. — Article 10A (Fair Trial) — Validity of Guilty Pleas in Petty Cases — A Guilty Plea in a summary trial must be informed and voluntary, especially when it carries long-term civil consequences like a stained police record. Magistrates often record guilty pleas mechanically in petty cases where the accused pays a small fine (e.g., Rs. 500) to end the matter quickly. The Court held that this practice is dangerous if the accused does not realize this \"small fine\" will permanently appear on their Police Character Certificate. Under Section 243 Cr.P.C. and Article 10A, the Magistrate acts as a guardian of fairness. They must ensure the accused understands that the plea might result in a lasting record, not just a momentary fine. Differentiation of Record — FIR vs. Conviction —Adverse Material Defined— For the purposes of issuing Police Clearance Certificates, criminal records must be conceptually divided. An “FIR-only” entry (mere accusation without challan/cognizance) cannot be disclosed as adverse…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register