| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 1243 2026 SLD 1243 |
Islamabad High Court
Income Tax Reference No. 327/2024
Presented By: (SARDAR EJAZ ISHAQ KHAN) JUDGE (BABAR SATTAR) JUDGE
12.03.2026 Sardar Abdul Wahab Farid and Ms. Maham Fatima, Advocates for the applicant.
Income Tax Reference No. 327/2024
Presented By: (SARDAR EJAZ ISHAQ KHAN) JUDGE (BABAR SATTAR) JUDGE
12.03.2026 Sardar Abdul Wahab Farid and Ms. Maham Fatima, Advocates for the applicant.
Asma Akram
VERSUS
Commissioner Inland Revenue, Islamabad & others
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Section: 133, 101
Law: Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 2024
Section: 26A
SUMMARY The High Court held that references filed directly before the High Court against orders of the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals), which were pending due to the procedural changes introduced by the Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 2024, must now be remitted to the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR). This is because the Finance Act, 2025 restored the appellate forum (ATIR) and the change is: Procedural Beneficial Therefore retrospective for pending cases only TAGLINE “Restoration of appeal to ATIR under Finance Act 2025 applies retrospectively to all pending tax references, requiring their remand from High Court to Tribunal.” ORDER; The learned counsel for the applicant submits that this Court, in Mian Group of Chakwal Karamdad Arcade through its Partner v. Assistant Commissioner Inland Revenue, Islamabad & others (I.T.R. No. 65 of 2024), decided on 14.11.2025, has already held that references filed directly before the High Court against orders of the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) and pending adjudication are liable to be remitted to the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (“Tribunal”) for decision in accordance with law. Since the instant reference also arises out of an order passed by the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals), the same is liable to be remitted to the Tribunal in terms of the said judgment. The question regarding the applicability of the Finance Act, 2025, came up for consideration before this Court in Mian Group of Chakwal Karamdad Arcade. This Court, by judgment dated 14.11.2025, held that “the changes brought to the forum for hearing a…