| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 1126 2026 SLD 1126 = 2026 PHC 762 |
Peshawar High Court
Writ Petition No. 7810-P of 2025:
Presented By: S. M. Attique Shah, CJ.
Present: Mr. Justice S. M. Attique Shah, CJ. Mr. Justice Muhammad Ijaz Khan. For the Petitioner(s) Barrister Amir Khan Chamkani For the state Mr. Shah Faisal Utmankhel, Advocate General, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Noman-ul-Haq Kakakhel, Addl. AG. Research Assistance by: Riaz Aslam Daavi, SRO, PHCP Date of Hearing: 29.01.2026
Writ Petition No. 7810-P of 2025:
Presented By: S. M. Attique Shah, CJ.
Present: Mr. Justice S. M. Attique Shah, CJ. Mr. Justice Muhammad Ijaz Khan. For the Petitioner(s) Barrister Amir Khan Chamkani For the state Mr. Shah Faisal Utmankhel, Advocate General, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Noman-ul-Haq Kakakhel, Addl. AG. Research Assistance by: Riaz Aslam Daavi, SRO, PHCP Date of Hearing: 29.01.2026
Barrister Muhammad Yousaf Khan (Petitioner)
VERSUS
Government of KPK and others (Respondents)
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 4, 9, 10A, 14, 25, 199, 142, 240, 212, 9, 11, 17, 21, 24, 37, 3, 5, 6, 7, 1985
Case Summary (Short) This constitutional petition challenged amendments made to the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Police Act, 2017 through the 2024 Amendment Act, arguing that they destroyed the operational autonomy of the police by giving excessive control to the Chief Minister over postings, transfers, and administration of senior police officers. The petitioner claimed these changes violated constitutional guarantees of fundamental rights, rule of law, due process, equality, and police independence, while also being inconsistent with established national and international principles of police autonomy. The Province defended the amendments, arguing that: Police is an executive body under elected government control Chief Minister’s oversight is lawful “superintendence” Petitioner lacked locus standi Service Tribunal jurisdiction applies Amendments only aligned existing rules The Court held: The petition is maintainable as public interest litigation Police must have operational autonomy but not absolute independence Chief Minister may exercise policy oversight only, not operational control Certain amendments (especially involving transfers of senior officers and deletion of key sections) violate constitutional and statutory principles Ultimately, the Court partially struck down the amendments, restoring key provisions of the 2017 Act to protect police independence. Relevant Laws & Constitutional Provisions Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 Article 4 – Right to lawful treatment Article 9 – Security of person Article 10A – Fair trial Article 14 – Dignity of man Article 25 – Equality before law Article 199 – Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court Article 142 – Legislative competence Article 240 – Public service matters Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Police Act, 2017 Section 9 – Powers of Chief Minister (law & order directions) Section 11 – Administration of Police / PPO authority Section 17 – Posting & transfer powers Section 21 – Posting of CCPO/DPO (deleted by amendment) Section 24 – Premature transfer of district police heads (deleted) Section 37 – Training institution…