Case Details

Citation(s)
1970 PLD 3104 = 1970 PLD 294
Lahore High Court
Letters Patent Appeal No. 788 of 1966, decided on 21st July 1969.
Presented By: A. R. Sheikh and Shafi-ur-Rahman, JJ
Makhan Singh and others v. Wadawa Singh and others A I R 1934 Lah. 763 ref. Firm Gokal Chand v. Firm Nand Ram A I R 1938 P C 292 .rel. Mian Abdul Khaliq for Appellant. A. R. Niazi for
Respondent.

ABDUR RAHIM-Appellant

VERSUS

TAJ MUHAMMAD-Respondent

Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Section: 1, 3

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XX, rr. 1 & 3 and O. XLI, r. 31-Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilita tion) Act (XXVIII of 1958)-"Judgment"-No regular procedure for writing, pronouncement and delivery of judgments in Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958-Principles of O. XX, rr. 1 & 3 and O. XL1, r. 31, C. P. C. can be invoked---- Judgment pronounced in open Court by Judge dying before he could sign it-Judgment, in circumstance, not a nullity. A Settlement Commissioner hearing a revision under the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958, accepted the same and announced his decision by a short urdu order "as per English order the revision petition is accepted". This short urdu order was signed by him but he died before signing the english order. It was contended that, in the circumstance, the unsigned english order was not a proper judgment in the case and was of no legal effect. The High Court negatived this contention and held that the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure with regard to writing of judgments and pronouncement thereof by the trial Court are contained in Order XX, rules 1, 2 and 3 and by the Appellate Court in Order XLI, rule 31. Since there is no regular procedure prescribed for writing, pronouncement and delivery of judgments in the Displaced Persons (Compensa tion and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), the principles embodied in the aforesaid provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure can be borrowed with advantage. The rules on the subject referred to above do not lay down the law that if the requirements are not complied with, the judgment or order shall be a nullity. A judgment is the final decision of the Court intimated to the parties and World at large by formal pronounce ment or delivery in open Court. It is a judicial act which must be performed in a judicial way. The decision which is so pronounced or intimated must be a declaration of the mind of the Court as it is at the time of the pronouncement. Minor irregularities as to the mode of delivery or manner of pronouncement do not matter as these can be cured. Up to the moment the judgment is…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register