| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 963 2026 SLD 963 = 2026 LHC 2179 |
Lahore High Court
C.R. No.341-D of 2013
Presented By: (RASAAL HASAN SYED) JUDGE
Date of hearing 12.2.2026 Petitioners by Raja Muhammad Sohail Iftikhar & Mr. Nadeem Ahmad Khan Kanju, Advocates.
Respondent No.1 by Mr. Ahmad Mansoor Chishti, Advocate.
Respondent No.2 by Nemo
C.R. No.341-D of 2013
Presented By: (RASAAL HASAN SYED) JUDGE
Date of hearing 12.2.2026 Petitioners by Raja Muhammad Sohail Iftikhar & Mr. Nadeem Ahmad Khan Kanju, Advocates.
Respondent No.1 by Mr. Ahmad Mansoor Chishti, Advocate.
Respondent No.2 by Nemo
Naureen Maqbool and another v. Khuda Bakhsh and others
Law: Transfer of Property Act, 1882
Section: 52
Law: Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Section: 1 & 2, 10
Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877
Section:
Tagline
Alienation during pendency of suit in violation of injunction is void; lis pendens binds even a bona fide purchaser.
Summary
The plaintiff (respondent No.1) filed a suit for specific performance based on an agreement of sale dated 09.07.2005. The vendor (respondent No.2) admitted the agreement and received full consideration.
During pendency of the suit: