| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 929 2026 SLD 929 = 2026 PCRLJ 289 |
Sindh High Court
Criminal Revision Application No. 116 of 2024, decided on 7th August, 2025.
Presented By: Before Zafar Ahmed Rajput and Miran Muhammad Shah, JJ
Barrister Mudassir Khan for Applicant. Ms. Rubina Qadir, Deputy Prosecutor General, Sindh (DPG) for the State.
Criminal Revision Application No. 116 of 2024, decided on 7th August, 2025.
Presented By: Before Zafar Ahmed Rajput and Miran Muhammad Shah, JJ
Barrister Mudassir Khan for Applicant. Ms. Rubina Qadir, Deputy Prosecutor General, Sindh (DPG) for the State.
GULZAR ALI---Applicant
VERSUS
The STATE---Respondent
Law: Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997
Section: XXVII,7,23
Law: Pakistan Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 302(b),353,392,397,34
Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997)--- ----Ss. 7 & 23---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302(b), 353, 392, 397 & 34--Qatl-i-amd, using assault or criminal force against a public servant, robbery, committing robbery or dacoity with a deadly weapons---Transfer of case from Anti-Terrorism Court to Ordinary Courts---Scope---Application of the accused/applicant for the transfer of case from Special Court to Ordinary Court was dismissed---Validity---Accused were charged that they made firing upon the police party, due to which two Police Officials were shot and died---In the instant case, the applicant was facing the charge of acting violently against police force in the execution of their duties and offered armed resistance against law enforcers, which act of the applicant falling under clauses (n) and (o) AntiTerrorism Act, 1997, came within the prescribed definition of "terrorism" assigning jurisdiction to the Trial Court being Anti-Terrorism Court to take the cognizance of the offence---Record revealed prima facie that the act in question was committed by the accused with full intention and mens rea to deter their arrest at the hands of law enforcers---In that regard, the term "action" was more appropriate and carried greater legal weight than the expression "designed to"--Incident took place in a thickly populated locality, where members of the Shaheen Force were performing patrolling duty to prevent and control crimes--Attack created alarm, panic and fear in the minds of the public, leaving the clear impression that if Police Officials themselves were not safe, then ordinary citizens could not expect protection---Therefore, it was evident that this was not a case of personal enmity or private vendetta; rather, it was a deliberate, intentional and armed assault upon law enforcers in the discharge of their lawful duty---Such action could neither have remained unnoticed by the locality nor could it be considered an ordinary offence, as its effect was to spread intimidation, insecurity and a sense of lawlessness amongst the public at large--Incident, in which one Police Constable lost his life was of a grave and serious nature and,…