Case Details

Citation(s)
2026 SLG 928 2026 SLD 928 = 2026 PCRLJ 282
High Court (AJ&K)
Criminal Misc. Petitions Nos. 294 and 295 of 2025, decided on 24th July, 2025.
Presented By: Before Syed Shahid Bahar, J
Waqar Farooq Abbasi and Syed Kashan Ali Bukhari for Applicant/Petitioner. Syed Faisal Gillani, Asst. A.G for the State.

ABDUL GHAFFAR---Applicant

VERSUS

STATE through Advocate General Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad and another---Respondents

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 498

Law: Azad Jammu & Kashmir Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Act, 1985

Section: X,10,18

(a)    Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 498---Azad Jammu and Kashmir Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Act (X of 1985), Ss. 10 & 18---Offence of zina, attempt to commit unnatural offence---Pre-arrest bail, refusal of---Accused-petitioner was alleged to be using a rented premises for purposes of committing zina---Pre-arrest bail was an extra-ordinary relief which was to be extended in rare and exceptional circumstances to the accused---Undeniably, the right to liberty was a fundamental constitutional guarantee, nevertheless when an individual was accused of heinous offences i.e. permitting an unlawful use of property in particular for others, the Courts must exercise their extraordinary discretionary powers with heightened vigilance and circumspection---This is imperative because pre-arrest bail is not an absolute right but an exceptional remedy, and its grant in such sensitive matters requires a meticulous balancing of the accused's fundamental right to liberty against the paramount public interest in preventing heinous crimes, ensuring the integrity of the investigative process and safeguarding the victims well-being and dignity---It is trite law that prearrest bail is not a routine entitlement---Given the heinous nature of the alleged acts and their far-reaching detrimental impact on society at large, the accused in the matter at hand did not merit the concession of this exceptional relief, particularly where reasonable grounds for belief in the commission of such grave, non-bailable offences were discernable formed the initial record, negating claims of ulterior motive, mala fide or further inquiry into innocence---Prearrest bail application was dismissed, in circumstances. 2009 PCr.LJ 1334; 2008 SCMR 980; 1999 PCr.LJ 86 and 2008 MLD 364 ref. Usama Bin Tahir Anwar v. State 2023 PCr.LJ 517 and Javed Iqbal v. The State 2022 SCMR 1424 rel. (b)    Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 498---Bail order---Observations of the Court---Scope---Observations made in bail order are solely tentative, intended merely for the purpose of the bail applications, and shall in no way prejudice the accused's…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register