Case Details

Citation(s)
2026 SLG 856 = 2026 SLD 856 = 2026 LHC 2292 = 2026 PLD 457 = 2026 PTD 1069
Lahore High Court
   Writ Petition No. 57129 of 2022
Presented By:  (Khalid Ishaq)     (Malik Javid Iqbal Wains)                  Judge
02.02.2026.     Barrister Usman G. Rashid Cheema, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.    Nadeem       Mahmood    Mian,          Advocate     for     the respondents-Department.

Abbas Ali  

VS

Collector of Customs & others

Law: Customs Act, 1969

Section: 139, 156(1), 8, 14, 70, 132, 16

Summary of the Case The petitioner, Abbas Ali, challenged the confiscation of: Gold jewellery (3.085 kg) US$ 10,000 The items were seized at Allama Iqbal International Airport, Lahore in 2004 for non-declaration under the Customs Act, 1969. Procedural History Customs authorities confiscated the gold and currency. The matter went through multiple stages: Collector (Adjudication) → ordered confiscation Appellate Tribunal → initially ordered release High Court & Supreme Court → litigation over validity of tribunal decisions Ultimately, final judicial decisions upheld the petitioner’s entitlement to: Return of gold Return of US$ 10,000 Issue Before the Court Whether the petitioner should receive: The actual gold (or its refined form), OR Its value based on an old rate (2007) as paid by Customs Key Findings The gold was: Melted at Pakistan Mint Converted into Gold Bar No. 2959 (2467.300 grams) Transferred to State Bank without lawful sale The Court held: Melting ≠ lawful disposal No legal auction/sale was conducted under the Customs Act Therefore, Section 169(5) (sale proceeds) does not apply The department: Illegally altered the form of property Cannot substitute gold with arbitrarily calculated value Legal Principles Established Ownership rights remain intact despite change in form of property State acts only as a custodian, not owner Property must be: Returned in original/refined form if still traceable, OR Paid at actual sale price (if lawfully sold) Protection under Article 24 of the Constitution (right to property) Final Decision The petition was allowed, and the Court ordered: Return of refined gold bar (2467.300 grams) to the petitioner Subject to Rs. 100,000 penalty Return of US$ 10,000 Or equivalent in PKR at current exchange rate The earlier payment of Rs. 5.87 million (based on 2007 value) was declared: Unlawful and invalid Core Takeaway The government cannot replace confiscated property with outdated monetary value unless it was lawfully sold—otherwise, the actual property (or its current equivalent) must be returned. ORDER;     Through the instant constitutional petition under Article 199 of the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register