Case Details

Citation(s)
2026 SLG 634 2026 SLD 634 = 2026 YLR 22
Islamabad High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 14 of 2018, decided on 7th July, 2025.
Presented By: Before Arbab Muhammad Tahir, J
Sajid Mehmood Shad for Appellant. Sardar Taimoor Aslam for
Respondent No. 1. Rana Rashid Javed for
Respondent No. 2. Sardar Arshad Mehmood for
Respondent No. 3. Kashif Hussain Shah, Special Public Prosecutor-SPP for the State. Muhammad Ishaq Inspector with record.

MUHAMMAD ZAREEF AHMED---Appellant

VERSUS

MUHAMMAD RIZWAN TAHIR SATTI and 3 others---Respondents

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 408,411,34

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 417(2A)

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 408, 411 & 34---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.417(2A)--Criminal breach of trust by clerk or servant, dishonestly receiving stolen property, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Appeal against acquittal--Accused were charged for committing criminal breach of trust being employees and dishonestly receiving stolen property---Perusal of the findings of the Courts revealed that the appellate Court based its findings by referring to only statement of one witness and the audit reportand affidavits of respondents 1 and 2 besides application Mark-A and omitted to take into consideration the rest of the prosecution evidence comprising statements of 8 witnesses and certain documents--On the contrary, the Trial Court exhaustively discussed the entire prosecution evidence by determining points for determination and reasons thereupon---Not only that, but the Trial Court also appreciated the submissions of the defense and turned down the same with explanations---Noticeable that the entire prosecution evidence was repelled by appellate Court by rendering observations in omnibus fashion without reference to the said piece of evidence in-part or as a whole--Judgment-in-appeal even did not contain the details of the prosecution evidence--In such state of affairs, it could safely be held that the impugned judgment was result of misreading and non-reading of the evidence and, therefore, was not legally sustainable---Impugned judgment was set aside and matter was remanded to the appellate Court for re-writing of judgment. The Government of East Pakistan v. Hatem Molla and others 1968 PCr.LJ 622; Abdul Rashid Munshi and 3 others v. The State PLD 1967 SC 498 and Sona Mian and another v. The State PLD 1958 Dacca 572 rel. Date of hearing: 25th June, 2025. JUDGMENT ARBAB MUHAMMAD TAHIR, J.---Through the listed appeal under Section 417 (2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, Appellant Muhammad Zareef Ahmed impugn Judgment dated 14.12.2017, passed by the learned Addl. Session Judge-III (West) Islamabad, whereby appeal against conviction, filed by respondents 1 to 3- Muhmmad Rizwan Tahir Satti, Qari Waqar Ahmed and Raja Zahid…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register