| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 429 2026 SLD 429 = 2025 PTD 1833 |
Balochistan High Court
Balochistan Sales Tax Appeal No. 17-A of 2024, decided on 19th December, 2024. Date of hearing: 6th December, 2024.
Presented By: ): BEFORE MUHAMMAD HASHIM KHAN KAKAR, CHAIRMAN, HAIDER ALI SHIKOH, MEMBER AND SAIFULLAH KHAN, MEMBER
Musawer Kasi for Appellant Jam Saka Dashti and Sarmad Ahmed for
Respondent
Balochistan Sales Tax Appeal No. 17-A of 2024, decided on 19th December, 2024. Date of hearing: 6th December, 2024.
Presented By: ): BEFORE MUHAMMAD HASHIM KHAN KAKAR, CHAIRMAN, HAIDER ALI SHIKOH, MEMBER AND SAIFULLAH KHAN, MEMBER
Musawer Kasi for Appellant Jam Saka Dashti and Sarmad Ahmed for
Respondent
M/S CASING CORPORATION (PVT.) LIMITED
VS
COMMISSIONER BALOCHISTAN REVENUE AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER
Law: Balochistan Sales Tax on Services Act 2015
Section: 25,27,27(1),27(2)
Background: The BRA observed that the appellant operates a business in Balochistan and is required to register as a withholding agent under the Act. Notices were issued (20.09.2023, 11.12.2023) for voluntary registration, followed by reminders and a penalty of Rs. 50,000 for non-compliance. Despite extensions granted (until 31.01.2024), the appellant failed to register. 1 The Assistant Commissioner compulsorily registered the appellant under Section 27 of the Act. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this order. Appellant’s Arguments: The appellant claimed it only processes meat in Balochistan and does not avail any taxable services there. Therefore, it should not be required to register as a withholding agent. Respondent’s Arguments: The appellant has a place of business in Balochistan and carries on economic activity there. As a resident under the Act, it must register and withhold sales tax on services availed in Balochistan. Tribunal’s Analysis: Definitions under the Act: "Place of Business in Balochistan" includes owning/renting space where economic activity is carried out. "Resident" includes a company with a place of business in Balochistan. Findings: It is an admitted fact that the appellant has a factory in Hub, Balochistan. Even basic activities like transporting raw materials and finished goods involve taxable services. The appellant falls under the definition of a resident with a place of business in Balochistan. Therefore, it is legally required to register as a withholding agent under Section 25. On Compulsory Registration: Since the appellant failed to register voluntarily despite notices and extensions, the BRA was justified in compulsorily registering it under Section 27. Registration does not automatically create a liability to withhold tax; it only obligates the appellant to do so when it actually avails taxable services in Balochistan. Decision: The appeal is dismissed. The orders of the Assistant Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals) are upheld. The appellant remains compulsorily registered with the BRA as a withholding agent. Key Point: Physical presence and economic activity in…