Law:

Section:

Keywords: Prosecution, Custody, Defence Witness, Cross-Examination, Recovery, Examination, Evidence, Defence, Fine, Period, Information, Investigation, Disposed Of, Dismissal From Service Result: Order accordingly JUDGMENT The appellant was convicted by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jacobabad, for an offence under section 43(3) of the Abkari Act, and sentenced to R. I. For one year, and a fine of Rs. 100 or, in default, to suffer R. I. For two months more. He has come in appeal through the Jail authorities. 2. The prosecution story, in brief, is that, on the 20th of June 1974, some spy information was received by the then Excise Inspector, Akhtar Ali Bhutto that the appellant was on the lookout to sell charas. He had taken two mashirs with himself, and raided the hotel of the appellant. Contraband charas was secured from the person of the appellant, and, when the hotel was searched, a big piece of charas was found lying under the bed. When it was weighed, it was found to be forty tolas. After due investigation, the case came to be challaned in Court. 3. The appellant in his statement at the trial denied the allegations made against him, and also examined a defence witness, by the name of Chutto, who had precious little to say, except that he knew the appellant as a labourer. 4. The prosecution to support of its case examined only Abdus Subhan, he mashir, and the statement of the then Excise…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492