| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 184 2026 SLD 184 |
Civil Revision No. 315 of 2018
PRESENT; (FIAZ AHMAD ANJUM JANDRAN) JUDGE
Petitioner by: Mr. Naseer Anjum Awan, Advocate,
Respondent No.3 by: Mr. Muhammad Arshad Raja, Advocate, Date of Hearing: 16.03.2021.
Muhammad Imran Khan
VERSUS
District Judge, Islamabad-West, etc.
Law: Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Section: 3, 2 ,115
Summary
The petitioner challenged concurrent judgments whereby his suit for recovery of outstanding rent was dismissed for want of evidence under Order XVII Rule 3 CPC. The High Court held that despite repeated opportunities and issuance of statutory notices, the petitioner failed to produce any evidence. Invocation of penal provisions was therefore justified. No illegality, misreading, or non-reading of evidence was found in the concurrent findings of the courts below, warranting interference in revisional jurisdiction. Consequently, the civil revision petition was dismissed.
Tag Line
“Suit rightly dismissed under Order XVII Rule 3 CPC where plaintiff persistently failed to produce evidence despite notice.â€
ORDER;