| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 104 2026 SLD 104 = 2025 SHC 1411 |
C.P. No.S-18 of 2025
ARSHAD HUSSAIN KHAN, J.
Petitioner: Through Mian Ashfaque Ahmed, Advocate.
Respondents: Nemo. Date of Hearing: 12.03.2025 Date of Order: 12.03.2025
[Muhammad Nsr Khan
VS
.Mst. Syeda Mahera Urooj and another ]
Law: Family Courts Act, 1964
Section: 17-A
Law: Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Section: 151
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
Summary:
The petitioner challenged a preliminary decree and appellate judgment in a family suit concerning maintenance, medical/delivery expenses, dower, and gold ornaments for his minor daughter. The trial court allowed interim maintenance under Section 17-A of the Family Courts Act, 1964. The petitioner failed to pay the interim maintenance, leading to striking off his defense and passing of a preliminary decree. His subsequent appeal and constitutional petition were dismissed. The High Court held that constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 cannot act as a second appeal and cannot re-evaluate concurrent factual findings of lower courts unless there is a manifest illegality, jurisdictional error, or perverse findings. The petition was dismissed to prevent vexatious litigation and uphold finality of family court decisions.
Sections/Articles used:
Section 17-A – Family Courts Act, 1964 (interim maintenance)