| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 5457 2025 SLD 5457 = 2025 PCRLJ 1773 |
Islamabad High Court
Writ Petition No. 2007 of 2020,* decided on 7th March, 2022.
Before Mohsin Akhtar Kayani and Saman Rafat Imtiaz, JJ
Muhammad Amir Niaz Bhadera for Petitioner. Irfan Ahmed Boola, Special Prosecutor, NAB for
Respondent No. 1.
Writ Petition No. 2007 of 2020,* decided on 7th March, 2022.
Before Mohsin Akhtar Kayani and Saman Rafat Imtiaz, JJ
Muhammad Amir Niaz Bhadera for Petitioner. Irfan Ahmed Boola, Special Prosecutor, NAB for
Respondent No. 1.
ARSHAD FAROOQ FAHEEM---Petitioner
VERSUS
NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU through Chairman, Islamabad and another---Respondents
Law: National Accountability Ordinance, 1999
Section: XVIII,9(a)(vi),9(a)(iv),9(a)(ix),9(a)(xii),25
Law: Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012
Section: XXI,3,7,10,11,30
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 265K
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
(a) National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999)-------S. 9(a)(vi)---Offence of misuse of authority---Necessary ingredient---Offence of corruption and corrupt practice within the meaning of S.9 (a) (vi) of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 is not an offence of strict liability---Use of authority without object of illegal gain or pecuniary benefit of undue favour to person with ulterior motive may not be a deliberate act to constitute an offence--Mens rea of offence under S.9(a)(vi) of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 forms two elements i.e. (1) conscious misuse of authority and illegal gain (2) undue benefit---In absence of any of such basic components of crime, misuse of authority is not culpable.The State v. Muhammad Idrees Ghauri 2008 SCMR 1118; Mansur-ul-Haq v. Government of Pakistan PLD 2008 SC 166 and The State v. Anwar Saifullah Khan PLD 2016 SC 276 rel.(b) National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999)-------Ss. 9(a)(iv), (vi), (ix), (xii) & 25 [as amended by National Accountability (Second Amendment) Ordinance (XXVII of 2019)]---Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act (XXI of 2012), Ss. 3, 7, 10, 11 & 30---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 265-K---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Offence of misuse of authority---Proof---Regulatory functions---Price fixing---Drug Pricing Committee---Voluntary Return or Plea bargain of co-accused---Effect---Petitioner / accused was Chairman of Drug Pricing Committee and he was alleged to have increased prices of drugs in connivance with accused pharmaceutical companies who had entered into plea bargain---Trial Court declined to acquit petitioner / accused in exercise of powers under S.265-K, Cr.P.C.---Validity---Provisions of Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012 has overriding effect upon National Accountability Ordinance, 1999---Both were special laws having different jurisdictions to settle their technical aspects but Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012 had ultimate authority to fix or re-fix price of any drug or it could decrease or increase the same, which was not in the purview of…