Law:

Section:

SAEEDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI, J: --The petitioner is seeking leave to appeal against the order of a learned Judge in Chambers of Lahore High Court, dated 13 -7-1992, whereby the learned Judge, in the pending Civil Revision Application No.804/86 appointed an Advocate as the Commissioner to inspect the premises in suit and to report whether any portion thereof had been damaged during the current seasonal rains and that the premises needed immediate repairs.

The learned Judge in Chambers appeared to have passed earlier in the above Civil Revision Application, an interim order of status quo against respondents 3 to 'S on the application of petitioner which is operative. Respondents 3 to 5 accordingly moved Misc. Application Nos. 225-C-92 and 267-C-92 before the learned Judge in Chambers for- early disposal of revision application and during the course of hearing of these applications, contended that on account of status quo order in the case. they are facing hardships as the premises in their possession has become dilapidated due to rains and they prayed for modification of the status quo order to the extent that they may be allowed to carry out the repair of the premises in order to keep the premises in its original condition. This prayer of the respondents was opposed by the petitioner whereupon the learned Judge appointed a Commissioner to inspect the premises in suit and report whether any portion thereof was damaged on account of rains and it required immediate repairs.