| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 5283 2025 SLD 5283 = 2025 SCMR 1687 |
Civil Petitions Nos. 885 to 887 of 2024, decided on 24th June, 2025. (Against the judgment dated 22.11.2023 of the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar passed in Tax Reference Nos. 22-P to 24-P of 2019).
Present: Yahya Afridi, CJ, Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui and Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, JJ
Ghulam Shoaib Jally, Advocate Supreme Court and Dr. Ishtiaq Ahmed Khan, Director-General (Law), FBR for Petitioner (in all cases). Muhammad Tariq, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondent (in all cases) (via video-link from Peshawar). Date of hearing: 23rd May, 2025.
The COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, PESHAWAR ---Petitioner
VERSUS
Messrs SUFI TAHIR NADEEM ---Respondent
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Section: 2(13AB), 113, 122(5), 177
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---
----Ss. 2(13AB), 113, 122(5) & 177---Consumer goods---Turnover--Determination---Amendment of assessment---Tax liability, demand of---Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG)---Packing material---Authorities revised the assessment of respondent / taxpayer considering packing material as consumer goods for the use of end user---Validity---Products in question were primarily used as a material for packing other products for various consumer goods and were not typically sold directly to consumers as a stand-alone product---Consumer could buy products packed in such films but would not typically purchase goods in question---Subject goods in their form as described in orders of lower fora were utilizable predominantly by end consumers---These were not directly considered as consumer items but had formed a key component for many consumer products and were meant primarily for an industrial / commercial use---Fast Moving Consumer Goods were those which were supplied in retail market as per "their" daily demand and did not qualify to form part of definition provided in section 2 (13AB) and (22A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Insertion of phase 'durable' which excludes such product was additionally applied for tax return in question---All such products described as durable were excluded via Finance Act, 2017---Supreme Court set aside judgment passed by High Court---Appeal was allowed.