Case Details

Citation(s)
2025 SLG 5283 2025 SLD 5283 = 2025 SCMR 1687
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petitions Nos. 885 to 887 of 2024, decided on 24th June, 2025. (Against the judgment dated 22.11.2023 of the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar passed in Tax Reference Nos. 22-P to 24-P of 2019).
Present: Yahya Afridi, CJ, Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui and Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, JJ
Ghulam Shoaib Jally, Advocate Supreme Court and Dr. Ishtiaq Ahmed Khan, Director-General (Law), FBR for Petitioner (in all cases). Muhammad Tariq, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondent (in all cases) (via video-link from Peshawar). Date of hearing: 23rd May, 2025.

The COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, PESHAWAR ---Petitioner

VERSUS

Messrs SUFI TAHIR NADEEM ---Respondent

Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001

Section: 2(13AB), 113, 122(5), 177

 

Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---

----Ss. 2(13AB), 113, 122(5) & 177---Consumer goods---Turnover--Determination---Amendment of assessment---Tax liability, demand of---Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG)---Packing material---Authorities revised the assessment of respondent / taxpayer considering packing material as consumer goods for the use of end user---Validity---Products in question were primarily used as a material for packing other products for various consumer goods and were not typically sold directly to consumers as a stand-alone product---Consumer could buy products packed in such films but would not typically purchase goods in question---Subject goods in their form as described in orders of lower fora were utilizable predominantly by end consumers---These were not directly considered as consumer items but had formed a key component for many consumer products and were meant primarily for an industrial / commercial use---Fast Moving Consumer Goods were those which were supplied in retail market as per "their" daily demand and did not qualify to form part of definition provided in section 2 (13AB) and (22A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Insertion of phase 'durable' which excludes such product was additionally applied for tax return in question---All such products described as durable were excluded via Finance Act, 2017---Supreme Court set aside judgment passed by High Court---Appeal was allowed.

🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register