| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 5196 2025 SLD 5196 = 2025 SHC 2438 |
C.P No.D-3325 of 2017
Abdul Hamid Bhurgri, J.
Date of hearing:- 28.08.2025 Mr. Muhammad Saeed, Advocate for petitioner. Ms. Zahrah Sehr Vayani, Assistant Attorney General.
[Nawab Abdul Jabbar
VERSUS
Federation of Pakistan and another]
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
Law: Sindh Industrial Relations Act, 2013
Section: 33
Summary
The petitioner, a retired Civil Aviation Authority employee, claimed that being illiterate, he was deceived into signing pension documents opting for full commutation of pension (third option), thereby losing entitlement to medical and hospitalization benefits. He sought reversal of this option after receiving the commuted amount. The respondent authority denied deception, asserting that the petitioner voluntarily opted, received payment, and executed a full and final settlement undertaking.
The Court held that the petition was filed after an unexplained delay of eight years, attracting the doctrine of laches, and that the allegations of deception raised disputed questions of fact not maintainable under constitutional (writ) jurisdiction. Having accepted the benefits, the petitioner could not resile from his choice. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.
Sections / Provisions Used
Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan – Constitutional (writ) jurisdiction