Case Details

Citation(s)
1992 SLG 744 1992 SLD 744 = 1992 PLD 158
Lahore High Court



Law:

Section:

(a) Land Reforms Regulation, 1959 [M.L.R. 641--

---- Para. 25 --- Jurisdiction to determine questions whether sale transaction in question, offended against the provisions of para. 25, Land Reforms Regulation, 1459 and whether para. 25, Land Reforms Regulation, 1959, would invalidate transaction in question or not was the one fa ling within the exclusive functions of the Land Commission or the Chief Land Commissioner who were charged with the duty of implementing the provisions of the Land Reforms Regulation, 1959 --- No other authority, including the Civil Courts and their higher hierarchy, could go into that aspect of the matter --- Revenue Authorities also, had no concern with the determination of the validity or otherwise of the sale transaction in the context of para 25, Land Reforms Regulation 1959-- Orders in this respect passed by Civil Court, Appelate Court, as also by the Revenue Authorities, right upto the Board of Revenue were, thus, without jurisdiction.,

PLD 1976 Rev. 13; Rulia and others v. Fateh'Muhammad and others 1989 CLC 1705 ref.

🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register