Law:

Section:

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-

----S. 302---Criminal Procedure Code. (V of 1898), S. 367---Trial Court's judgment did not contain the points for determination, nor any decision on the points with reasons therefor---Evidence produced by prosecution had not at a l been discussed---Arguments addressed before trial Court were not mentioned in the judgment which for a l these reasons did not fulfil the requirements of law and was violative of the provisions of S.367, Cr.P.C.---Trial Court while arriving at the conclusion about guilt of accused had not appraised the entire evidence---Statement of accused had also not been considered in its entirety-- Accused was not even properly examined under S.342, Cr.P.Cr- Conviction and sentence of accused were set aside in circumstances and case was sent back to Trial Court for rewriting the judgment after examining the accused by putting to him the incriminating materials arising out of evidence

Issa Khan v. The State PLD 1987 Quetta 174; Muhammad Hanif v. The State PLD 1977 Lah. 1253; Faiz and another v. The State 1983 SCMR 76; Safdar Ali v. The State PLD 1953 FC 93; Muhammad Aslam alias Aslam v. The State PLD 1953 FS 57 and Juma Khan v. The State 1990 PCr.LJ 56 ref