| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 4901 2025 SLD 4901 = 2025 PLC 999 |
Supreme Court (AJ&K)
Civil P.L.A. No.820 of 2024 and Civil Miscellaneous No.495 of 2024, decided on 14th January, 2025. (On appeal from the judgment of the Service Tribunal dated 10-12-2024 in Service Appeal No.438 of 2024).
Present: Kh. Muhammad Nasim and Raza Ali Khan, JJ
Raja Ibrar Hussain, Advocate for Petitioner. Raja Arshad Khan, Advocate for
Respondent No.1.
Civil P.L.A. No.820 of 2024 and Civil Miscellaneous No.495 of 2024, decided on 14th January, 2025. (On appeal from the judgment of the Service Tribunal dated 10-12-2024 in Service Appeal No.438 of 2024).
Present: Kh. Muhammad Nasim and Raza Ali Khan, JJ
Raja Ibrar Hussain, Advocate for Petitioner. Raja Arshad Khan, Advocate for
Respondent No.1.
WASEEMA ANAYAT
VERSUS
ABIDA BIBI and 5 others
Law: Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act, (VI of 1976)
Section: 9
Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act (VI of 1976)-------S. 9---Transfer order, cancellation of---Short span in recalling transfer order--Service Tribunal set-aside departmental order by which earlier transfer order was cancelled / recalled after just eleven (11) days---Validity---Record revealed that vide transfer order (dated 10.06.2021) the petitioner and respondent were transferred against each others posts, after the stay period of 3 years and 8 years respectively---Said stay period mentioned in the transfer order dated 10.06.2024 was admitted, which was more than sufficient period for serving at one station--Under S. 9 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act, 1976, a civil servant was obliged to serve under the Government, inside or outside of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, wherever he/she was posted---A civil servant has no absolute right to remain posted at a particular station for an indefinite period or to seek posting at a station of his/her own choice---It appeared from the record that the transfer order dated 10.06.2024 was issued on the basis of the stay period, which had been cancelled just after a period of 11 days, without assigning any reason, vide order dated 21.06.2024---In such state of affairs, the Service Tribunal had committed no illegality while accepting the appeal and setting aside the earliertransfer-recalling order dated 21.06.2024---Practice of cancellation of the transfer orders within a short span of time, without assigning any reason, on the face of it is a malpractice and such orders cannot be protected by the Courts---In the present case, the Service Tribunal while handing down the impugned judgment had dealt with the proposition involved in the matter in a legal manner and had committed no illegality while setting aside the impugned departmental order dated 21.06.2024--Petitioner had failed to point out any legal question of public importance involved in the petition for leave to appeal and leave could not be granted in every case as a routine, just to create false hopes in the mind of the litigant---Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed.Naila Bashir v. Syeda Zanib-un-Nisa and 4 others 2013 PLC (C.S.) 831 ref.Date…