| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 4776 2025 SLD 4776 = 2025 SCP 411 = 2026 SCMR 843 = 2026 PLC 805 |
Civil Petition No.4757 of 2024 (Against the order dated 16.05.2024 passed by the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore in Appeal No.4144/2023)
Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Ghulam Murtaza … Petitioner
VERSUS
District Police Officer, Gujrat and others ....Respondent
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 302,311,147,148
Law: Punjab Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975
Section:
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 10A,14,9
Tagline : Departmental proceedings against a civil servant founded solely on his involvement in a criminal case, collapses upon acquittal—otherwise the charge must be independently probeable for the department to proceed.
Summary
The court ruled that departmental proceedings against a civil servant based solely on his involvement in a criminal case collapse once he is acquitted in that case. The charges for departmental action must be independently probeable and supported by evidence unrelated to the criminal case. Since the petitioner was acquitted and the department failed to establish any separate misconduct, his dismissal was invalid and he was reinstated.
Core Points
- Petitioner was a police constable implicated in a criminal case under sections 302, 311, 147, and 148 PPC.
- Departmental proceedings were initiated solely on the basis of his involvement in the criminal case.
- Inquiry reports did not assess separate allegations of dereliction of duty.
- Petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case on merit.
- Departmental disciplinary proceedings require independent and probeable evidence of misconduct.
- Involvement in a criminal case alone is not a sufficient ground for departmental action after acquittal.
- Acquittal removes the foundation for departmental charges based solely on that involvement.
- Persisting with departmental action despite acquittal violates constitutional rights to due process and fair trial (Article 10A), dignity (Article 14), and livelihood (Article 9).
- Petitioner’s dismissal and subsequent appeals were overturned; reinstatement ordered.
Law and Sections
| Legal Provision | Description | Applicable Context |
|---|---|---|
| Section 302 PPC | Punishment for murder | Criminal charge in FIR |
| Section 311 PPC | Attempt to commit murder | Criminal charge in FIR |
| Section 147 PPC | Punishment for rioting | Criminal charge in FIR |
| Section 148 PPC | Rioting armed with deadly weapon | Criminal charge in FIR |
| Punjab Police (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 1975 | Governs disciplinary proceedings against police | Departmental inquiry conducted under these rules |
| Article 10A, Constitution of Pakistan | Right to fair trial and due process | Protection against arbitrary departmental action |
| Article 14, Constitution of Pakistan | Right to dignity | Reinforces fair treatment of civil servant |
| Article 9, Constitution of Pakistan | Right to life (includes right to livelihood) | Protects employment security from unjust dismissal |
ORDER