Law:

Section:

Industrial dispute- ----Increase in salary-Demand for increase in wages made on ground of such increase having been allowed in other industhes and on basis of increase in cost of living-Such increase neither proved to have been made in comparable concerns nor could it be claimed on ground of increase in cost of living in view of increase in cost of living allowance already allowed by Government-Evidence produced found to be meagre and insufficient-Award of Labour Court allowing increase set aside. S. Zamirul Hasan for Appellant. Nemo for Respondent. DECISION This appeal has been filed against the award of Labour Court. 2. The Union raised the Industrial dispute, raising 23 demands. The conciliation proceedings were resumed. Since there was no settlement an application was filed in the Labour Court under section 32(1-A) of I. R. O., 1969. The appellant resisted the demands. The General Secretary of the Union alone appeared as witness in support of the demands. 3. The Labour Court on assessment of the evidence accepted' Demands Nos. 5 and 12 while rejected the remaining demands. Demand No. 5 relates to increase in wages while Demand No. 12 relates to the payment of money claimed due to workers. 4. I have heard the arguments of the learned Representative of the appel­lant, while none has appeared on behalf of the respondent in spite of the service of the notice. 5. The learned representative of the appellant confined his objection to Demand No. 5. The Union had claimed 50 % increase in the basic salary on…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492